New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (15772 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:37am Oct 28, 2003 EST (# 15773 of 15786)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Maybe these links are windy, but I tried to make them clear.

. 1623 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b2bd/1792

. 1624 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b2bd/1793

! ! ! ! ! ! !

A key point that I'd like to get across is that "games" which are inherently unstable, and now tend to explode can be stabilized if they are put into assemblies of games that are interconnected - and, on balance, acceptable to all the parties.

! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

For that, you need facts held in common - and enough knowledge for clear scorekeeping ( people don't have to keep score the same - but they have to know enough for stable and reasonable ansers.

As a technical matter, diplomats don't know how to do this now, in complex cases, even when they desperately want to. I think that, if I were permitted to sort my situation with the NYT out on a win-win basis - I could go a long way toward showing them how to do so.

I promised to try to do that - but it seems to me that the NYT ought to want that, too.

That's a technical issue - and if I could get "out of jail" I think I could show it in a way that would be to the advantage of the NYT - and the whole world - and with much lower costs to the NYT in every respect I can think of than the costs the organization is paying already.

fredmoore - 08:38am Oct 28, 2003 EST (# 15774 of 15786)

Cantabb,

I am intrigued but not obsessed with anything that can stand up so straight for so long when so far removed from any kind of Truth or significant purpose?

You are quite a character .. in a barnyard sort of way.

jorian319 - 08:40am Oct 28, 2003 EST (# 15775 of 15786)
The earth spin rate is slowing 2 msc/day as evidenced by the additon of a leap second every 500 days - James "I failed math" Nienhuis

I object to the use of "barnyard" as a derogatory adjective.

More Messages Recent Messages (11 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense