New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(15684 previous messages)
cantabb
- 03:12pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15685 of 15695)
lchic - 02:31pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (# 15683 of 15683)
how 'borders' maintain equilibrium
Equilibrium implies flexibility, some back and forth
re-definition of borders. Most nations maintain well-defined,
mutually well-respected borders. Doesn't mean we don't have
some disputed territories too [India/Pakistan re Kashmir;
China/Tibet, China/India; Parts of Middle East]. Back and
forth annexation is possible IF there were an active border
war.
In a criss-cross global world how does the
influence of that within a boundary cross the boundary while
maintaining it
Cultural (movies etc), TV, trade, travel, Internet, etc.
rshow55
- 03:24pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15686 of 15695) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Sent note.
lchic
- 03:56pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15687 of 15695) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Equilibrium
initially intended to use the word homeostasis ...
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?r=2&q=homeostasis
lchic
- 03:59pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15688 of 15695) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Even though boundaries are maintained the strengths and
weaknesses of a culture become evident.
WRT missile defense said to be 95% hype ... and everybody
knows it ...
Is the nation using the 5/95 1:19 ratio really respected?
bluestar23
- 04:00pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15689 of 15695)
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A46870-2003Oct18.html
Here's some MD news...courtesy of google news...
bluestar23
- 04:02pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15690 of 15695)
from the above:
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, October 19, 2003
President Bush's drive to enlist foreign help in building a
missile defense network has begun to attract foreign
businesses but is being hampered by tight U.S. controls on
technology sharing, according to American and European
officials.
The controls, designed two decades ago to limit missile
proliferation, make no distinction between offensive and
defensive technologies. As a result, U.S. and foreign firms
eager to enter detailed talks complain of being caught in the
same net meant to keep U.S. technical know-how out of the
hands of terrorists or nations hostile to the United States.
Bush ordered an interagency review of the controls, known
as the Missile Technology Control Regime, in a presidential
directive last December. But the review is months behind
schedule and fraught with disagreements over how to carve out
exceptions for missile defense
bluestar23
- 04:03pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15691 of 15695)
more MD news:
http://www.gazette.com/display.php?sid=604126
bluestar23
- 04:04pm Oct 26, 2003 EST (#
15692 of 15695)
from the above:
Colorado Springs will house the nerve center of the United
States’ fledgling missile defense system, further solidifying
its role as the hub of homeland defense.
The city is home to NORAD, the nation’s early warning
missile system, and Northern Command, charged with defending
the United States against attack.
In September, the first unit charged with defending the
nation against missile attack will begin operations.
Called the Missile Defense Brigade, it was activated
Thursday at Peterson Air Force Base.
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|