New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (15547 previous messages)

bluestar23 - 09:53pm Oct 23, 2003 EST (# 15548 of 15554)

Off-Topic, but..:

Telegraph:

"Pressure mounted on the New York Times yesterday to return a Pulitzer Prize won by their Stalin-era Moscow correspondent, Walter Duranty, after an historian hired by the paper found that he had uncritically recycled Soviet propaganda.

Mr Duranty, who died in 1957, has been condemned as "a disgrace in the history of the New York Times".

However, Arthur Sulzberger Jnr, the publisher of the newspaper - while accepting that Mr Duranty should not have won his 1932 Pulitzer - expressed concern that taking the prize away now, seven decades after it was awarded, smacked of Stalin's own "air-brushing" of history.

In the rarefied world of America's liberal media, it is hard to know which institution takes itself more seriously: the Pulitzer Prize, or the New York Times. Thus a scrap between the two, even a 70-year-old scrap, has rapidly turned into compulsive viewing.

Mr Sulzberger - whose newspaper suffered a blow this summer with the unmasking of star reporter Jayson Blair as a serial fabricator of stories - also asserted that it did not have Mr Duranty's tainted Pulitzer, and therefore could not "return" it.

The newspaper commissioned the review of Mr Duranty's work after protests led by Ukranian-American groups, angry that the reporter failed to report a famine that killed millions of Ukranians.

Mr Sulzberger said his paper would abide by the final decision of the Pulitzer Board.

But he went on to express concern that "the board would be setting a precedent for revisiting its judgments over many decades".

jorian319 - 10:48pm Oct 23, 2003 EST (# 15549 of 15554)
The earth spin rate is slowing 2 msc/day as evidenced by the additon of a leap second every 500 days - James "I failed math" Nienhuis

Nooooo, Will. I do production and air work, voiceovers, copywriting and graphics for a set of small market radio stations. I live in "horse country" and am blessed to have a couple of good ones and some excellent trainers. Right now I am learning through a very talented cutting-bred quarter horse that I got as a yearling and is now three. We're training for a class of AQHA (American Quarter Horse Assoc) competition called "Versatility Ranch Horse". It involves cutting, reining, roping and trail and it all has to be done by the same horse/rider. I think I have the horse that can do it. Anyhow, I'm - er, we're - going to try. At least it's keeping me and my wife fit in our fifties!

The concern Robert imagines I have about the grave matters he allides-to-but-never-discusses is all but nonexistant. He mistakes facetiousness and sarcasm for profundity.

So WhoAreYou, Coop?

wrcooper - 11:50pm Oct 23, 2003 EST (# 15550 of 15554)

jorian319

So WhoAreYou, Coop?

I am a man of moderately advanced years who lives in a large city on the shore of Lake Michigan. My personal grooming, sartorial choices, and general style have metrosexual written all over them, down to the uniformly black beret, black turtle-neck sweater, black pants, black belt and black shoes. If I weren't not in Manhattan, I'd think I was, I surely must be or want to be, and I'd think I worked in advertising or graphic design or the legitimate theater. I'm almost certainly an aesthete, but I might be a writer, but, if I were, an honest self-appraisal, so necessary to the successful pursuit of any writer's inner journey, would force me to consider myself affected, pretentious and lacking only garrish motley to proclaim myself a fool. So you can deduce from that and all the rest of the above whatever else you wish to know about me. My sister in Montana raises American Curlies, and her husband, a Jewish psychotherapist, has a pet steer upon which he practices his roping. But that detail must have seemed obvious to you.

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense