New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(15331 previous messages)
lchic
- 08:53am Oct 21, 2003 EST (#
15332 of 15346) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
Truth - does technology transform thinking - does truth
'change'?
http://www.closertotruth.com/topics/creativitythinking/111/index.html
http://www.closertotruth.com/topics/creativitythinking/111/111transcript.html
ROBERT: Let's broadly look at how technology affects
thinking, because some say that it's nothing less than a shift
in worldview. George [Kozmetsky] was talking about how
something that used to take an hour now takes fifteen minutes.
What does that do to the way we make decisions, the way we
reflect or meditate?
MARVIN: Again, I have mixed feeling about questions like
that, because I think we still think in pretty much the same
way. Our brains haven't been changed, but the tools that we
have are immensely better. If somebody asks me a question of
fact, I can usually either fail or succeed in finding the
answer from the Web pretty fast. As for computing, we can
solve problems numerically and analytically--
ROBERT: Aren't there pressures to be less reflective and
make decisions faster, because facts are coming at us faster
and are more readily at our disposal, and people expect faster
answers?
MARVIN: Well, there are a lot of problems like that.
Sometimes we're under pressure to decide faster; sometimes,
with the great leverage of technology, a decision can affect
more people and in a shorter time. One of the most dangerous
things is the rapid communication in political affairs: you
might have a TV network asking, "What does the public think?"
and five minutes later they'll say that seventy percent of the
American people think such-and-such, and so forth.
ROBERT: And maybe it was thirty percent just two days
earlier.
MARVIN: That's right. And if you wait a week, maybe it'll
settle down. But very few of these media people are aware that
such sampling is unstable and very dangerous--opinions can
spread like an epidemic. The general populace seems to think
that if a lot of people believe something, then they should,
too. It's called a flip-flop, and in computers it leads to the
destruction of information rather than the increasing of it.
lchic
- 09:01am Oct 21, 2003 EST (#
15333 of 15346) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
&
ROBERT: CONCLUDING COMMENT
FEW people get what's really going on here. The change in
mental process is nothing less than a shift in worldview.
Technology is radically transforming our thinking in at least
three new ways:
(1) information is freely available, and therefore
interdisciplinary ideas and cross-cultural communication are
widely accessible;
(2) time is compressed, and therefore reflection is
condensed and decision-making is compacted;
(3) individuals are empowered, and therefore private
choice and reach are strengthened and one person can have the
presence of an institution.
So what kind of new thinking is technology engendering?
Notice what happens.
With an increasing number of diverse ideas circulating
freely and widely, and with people more empowered but with
less time to assess value, and with vast communications
amplifying opinions, this new thinking is at once creative and
innovative, volatile and turbulent.
We have to face such complexity to keep closer to truth.
cantabb
- 09:02am Oct 21, 2003 EST (#
15334 of 15346)
lchic - 08:45am Oct 21, 2003 EST (# 15331 of 15332)
That poster can't write .... read/write -
which comes first?
He's NOT alone in this !
That poster' plays the idot on the threads
... why don't you go into the other threads and chastise the
fellow?
That, I think, you can do much better ! Better with the
"world asset" tiara.
I can understand your interest in that: THIS thread getting
too 'warm' ?
lchic
- 09:06am Oct 21, 2003 EST (#
15335 of 15346) ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has
to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong
foundation
OH! You found yourself in the 'hot' seat :)
(11 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|