New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (15277 previous messages)

lchic - 08:48am Oct 20, 2003 EST (# 15278 of 15283)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Trends - Broadsheets (UK) ' ... increased pagination allowed them to devote more space to foreign stories than 20 years before. Extra pages of comment and analysis provided a larger platform for debates, allowing papers to offer a range of opinions about issues compared with the previous era when there was room only for a single point of view. ......

http://media.guardian.co.uk/presspublishing/story/0,7495,1066524,00.html

Trends are often universal ...

Has the range of debate, viewpoints, opinion on MD issues - as in published NYT stories - been given: less | same | greater coverage over past decade?

lchic - 09:37am Oct 20, 2003 EST (# 15279 of 15283)
ultimately TRUTH outs : TRUTH has to be morally forcing : build on TRUTH it's a strong foundation

Cantabb -

North Korea is a negotiation problem ...

Gaming theory, a focus of the film 'A beautiful mind' re Nash and his work for the USA Government, is dismissed by you -

Showalter states the Nash Theory needs further refinement - for use in diplomatic negotiations

What does Cantabb know - that others don't?

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.jiLzbKLRQJv.3688418@.f28e622/16977

-----

This was a comment on you - no third party

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.jiLzbKLRQJv.3688418@.f28e622/16978

-----

Truth is unique to each reader of a page, their coming to it with a unique backgound.

Emperor's Clothes V Reagan Start of Star Wars ... I made a valid point ... Tax Payer Pays for wastage.

-----

15259 - prejudging the opinions of others - where are your facts Cantabb?

-----

And where are Cantabb's subject matter contributions to the thread re MD

START

END

no substance!

bluestar23 - 12:05pm Oct 20, 2003 EST (# 15280 of 15283)

fredmoore:

"good job, well done Lchic!

Freddy, just shut your moronic mouth for a while, OK..? If that's your idea of helping things here along, you're really the largest idiot here, worse than Showalter...

bluestar23 - 12:17pm Oct 20, 2003 EST (# 15281 of 15283)

WRC:

"I said, this recommendation is a personal suggestion. People may choose to read rshow55 and lchic's posts. That's fine. I suspect, however, that many folks take a quick look at the forum, read an rshow55 post rambling on about this or that, and they never come back. That's a pity, because this issue is important..

I think the "Ignore Posts list" is designed for posters just like rshow55 and lchic and robkettenberg."

You still do not see the utter lack of a logical interconnect between Forum posters using "ignore" function and new posters who are surfing and will NOT HAVE "Ignore" function "ON" and who therefore WILL SEE showalter's and lchic's posts ANYWAY....geddit...????

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense