New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (15232 previous messages)

rshow55 - 11:44am Oct 19, 2003 EST (# 15233 of 15233)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Cooper's 15230 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.W4ohbwSVPFc.3498492@.f28e622/16942 is a fine summary-statement - and Gisterme makes a basic point, too when he asks 15219 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.W4ohbwSVPFc.3498492@.f28e622/16931

"Why??? Why release anything about what the defense system's capabilities are, especially about details of the actual engagement strategy?"

Could missile defense installations, even if they are no more than bluff - be worthwhile? The answer's yes. And the arguments for putting some resources into missile defense R and D are significant. These arguments, like other arguments - depend on facts and judgements.

Psychological warfare - bluffing - can be essential in war and useful in diplomacy - and we have a great deal of experience, now, about what they are good for, and what psychological warfare and bluffing cost. Since the Eisenhower administration, at the earliest, Americans have been deeply committed to patterns of psychological warfare - and thought a lot about them. President Eisenhower did - and he had clear thoughts about how much he trusted. them. He trusted them some - but feared them, too. He, and people around him, longed for stable solutions. (Bluffs are inherently unstable.) They were concerned with questions about foresight - and a very high stakes issue of foresight leads the news today:

State Department Foresaw Trouble Now Plaguing Iraq By ERIC SCHMITT and JOEL BRINKLEY http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/19/international/worldspecial/19POST.html

Several officials said the study's warnings on security, utilities and civilian rule were ignored by the Pentagon until recently.

We need to be concerned about the reasonably forseeable consequences of our actions.

The Bush administration's batting average on "hitting the target" on its facts and judgements has been low - low enough so that it makes sense to ask hard questions. Foresight is a big concern. What are the reasonably forseeable consequences of our actions? More foresight than we're showing ought to be expected now.

When the "ideal short term solution" has forseeable and very bad long term consequences - then it ceases to be a "reasonable solution" - unless the long term consequences are taken into account, too, and reasonably adressed.

Bluffing has its limits. And the tolerance of the rest of the world for US "wisdom" is deteriorating very, very rapidly because this administration so often combines stupidity and bullying.

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


To post a message, compose your text in the box below, then click on Post My Message (below) to send the message.

Message:



You cannot rewrite history, but you will have 30 minutes to make any changes or fixes after you post a message. Just click on the Edit button which follows your message after you post it.