New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(14971 previous messages)
cantabb
- 10:37am Oct 14, 2003 EST (#
14972 of 14980)
fredmoore - 10:28am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14971 of
14971)
Cantabb: A Picayune
You keep confirming your barnyard/schoolyard residence.
KAEP: 1. A 10 year plan 2. With countries
providing funds on a percentage of GDP basis ... up to .5%
by mutual agreement. 3. For an international research and
implementation program for: A. Converting one major power
station in every city over 5 million people to dry rock
geothermal. B. Developing and implementing Thermoelectric
fabrics (eg polythiophene) for urban and agricultural power
generation. C. Developing space based solar collectors and
microwave transmission of power from space D. Terminating
every stormwater and major farm runoff in an engineered
wetland in order to conserve land based EMERGY in riverine
catchments - from where it originates. This avoids the
localised and catastrophic build up of energy at coastal
boundaries around the planet, which is what we perceive as
Climate Change. With all nations working together as
partners, created equal and working together for a simple
common KAEP goal, defence from missiles of all kinds will be
Guaranteed.
You version of "Loop Test," reflecting His Master's Voice
loyalty.
Just repeating things doesn't make it so, just like
parroting isn't taken for anything original or new !
I win .... THIS game!
That you can shout in your school-yard ! Fits in there,
better !
fredmoore
- 10:47am Oct 14, 2003 EST (#
14973 of 14980)
Cantabb: A Picayune & a Sore LOSER!
KAEP: 1. A 10 year plan
2. With countries providing funds on a percentage of GDP
basis ... up to .5% by mutual agreement.
3. For an international research and implementation program
for: A. Converting one major power station in every city over
5 million people to dry rock geothermal. B. Developing and
implementing Thermoelectric fabrics (eg polythiophene) for
urban and agricultural power generation. C. Developing space
based solar collectors and microwave transmission of power
from space D. Terminating every stormwater and major farm
runoff in an engineered wetland in order to conserve land
based EMERGY in riverine catchments - from where it
originates. This avoids the localised and catastrophic build
up of energy at coastal boundaries around the planet, which is
what we perceive as Climate Change.
With all nations working together as partners, created
equal and working together for a simple common KAEP goal,
defence from missiles of all kinds will be Guaranteed.
I win .... THIS game!
cantabb
- 10:56am Oct 14, 2003 EST (#
14974 of 14980)
fredmoore - 10:47am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14973 of
14973)
Cantabb: A Picayune & a Sore LOSER!
Your Schoolyard/barnyard behavior continues....
KAEP: 1. A 10 year plan....... 3. For an
international research and implementation program for: A.
Converting one major power station in every city over 5
million
With all nations working together as
partners, created equal and working together for a simple
common KAEP goal, defence from missiles of all kinds will be
Guaranteed.
Repeating yourself : His Master's Voice "Loop Test" !
I win .... THIS game!
Take it your school yard. You don't really belong in
civilized society.
"Irregardless" of what you think you have to say
about KAEP ! Take it to the next rally !
Relate if you can to MD. What you think is good for South
Africa (or elsewhere?) is NOT good for every other country.
Certainly not for USA.
klsanford0
- 11:09am Oct 14, 2003 EST (#
14975 of 14980)
KAEP:
"I win .... THIS game!"
Stop being silly...these are the words of a child, not an
adult....your post is sadly off-topic, a typical feature of
this disease-ridden Forum....
klsanford0
- 11:13am Oct 14, 2003 EST (#
14976 of 14980)
I believe my posts last night successfully argued the
underlying rationale for MD with regard to the previous MAD
Doctrine. Time to move on and discuss current systems
architecture....I have friends who are also interested in this
as you will see....
cantabb
- 11:13am Oct 14, 2003 EST (#
14977 of 14980)
fredmoore-Schoolyard is likely to continue.
Can't "Ignore." BUT his yowling tantrums need to be dealt
with....
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|