New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14965 previous messages)

fredmoore - 09:13am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14966 of 14980)

Cantabb,

You can either WAKEUP one day and hear the missiles raining down or you can wake up one day and feel the electric power from the sun and the earth's core directly permeating your very being.

We all know your choice! We all know your belligerence!

The equations are thus:

300million Rules 6billion ===== CRASH BANG

6Billion Rules 6Billion ===== LONG PROSPEROUS FUTURE

KAEP: 300million/6Billion >>>>>>converting slowly but steadily >>>>> 6BILLION/6BILLION

cantabb - 09:35am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14967 of 14980)

fredmoore - 09:13am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14966 of 14966)

Cantabb, You can either WAKEUP one day and hear the missiles raining down or you can wake up one day and feel the electric power from the sun and the earth's core directly permeating your very being.

The question was: relationship between KAEP & MD -- IF you can explain it, that is....

We all know your choice! We all know your belligerence!

"Belligerence" ? Wasn't that from YOU, right from your very first to me here ?

Forget that ?

The equations are thus:

300million Rules 6billion ===== CRASH BANG

6Billion Rules 6Billion ===== LONG PROSPEROUS FUTURE

KAEP: 300million/6Billion >>>>>>converting slowly but steadily >>>>> 6BILLION/6BILLION

Take all this a Rally !

Again, relationship between KAEP & MD as relates to the Science Forum ?

This you have NOT yet defined. Unless it was hidden in your schoolyard/barnyard !

cantabb - 09:36am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14968 of 14980)

"Take all this to a Rally" : Edited

fredmoore - 10:03am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14969 of 14980)

Cantabb,

Your opinions, bounded by poor comprehension and lack of intuition, are valueless.

A militarised space is NOT inevitable because what really matters is the defence of free nations and that, only a KAEP can provide. Missile shields CANNOT provide it! Nor can your idle picayune.

cantabb - 10:17am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14970 of 14980)

fredmoore - 10:03am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14969 of 14969)

Cantabb, Your opinions, bounded by poor comprehension and lack of intuition, are valueless.

The question was YOUR opinion on KAEP-MD linkage, if any that you CAN explain.... Apart from your overt hostility.

You need facts, NOT "intuition" [look up the dictionary]. What more can I say about YOUR "comprehension" that I've NOT said before.

A militarised space is NOT inevitable because what really matters is the defence of free nations and that, only a KAEP can provide. Missile shields CANNOT provide it! Nor can your idle picayune.

Aren't you arguing with yourself here ? Who said a militarized space is "inevitable" and necessary ?

UNLESS you can explain yourself, you're just one school-yard ball, filled with unmitigated bile ! A waste !

fredmoore - 10:28am Oct 14, 2003 EST (# 14971 of 14980)

Cantabb: A Picayune

KAEP: 1. A 10 year plan

2. With countries providing funds on a percentage of GDP basis ... up to .5% by mutual agreement.

3. For an international research and implementation program for: A. Converting one major power station in every city over 5 million people to dry rock geothermal. B. Developing and implementing Thermoelectric fabrics (eg polythiophene) for urban and agricultural power generation. C. Developing space based solar collectors and microwave transmission of power from space D. Terminating every stormwater and major farm runoff in an engineered wetland in order to conserve land based EMERGY in riverine catchments - from where it originates. This avoids the localised and catastrophic build up of energy at coastal boundaries around the planet, which is what we perceive as Climate Change.

With all nations working together as partners, created equal and working together for a simple common KAEP goal, defence from missiles of all kinds will be Guaranteed.

I win .... THIS game!

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense