New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14727 previous messages)

cantabb - 10:30am Oct 9, 2003 EST (# 14728 of 14730)

rshow55 - 09:09am Oct 9, 2003 EST (# 14722 of 14727)

Mere verbiage -- dismissed before:

Sometimes - for basic human reasons - and logical reasons - it is useful to switch between different perspectives - construct a shared space by comparing notes about comparison and contrast.

May be “reasons” that sound “logical” to you – and that doesn’t say or amount to much, does it ?

One can STILL ‘switch’ between perspectives on THE SAME specific issue, if one were focused and wanted to make a rational point. This gobbledygook doesn’t even make sense. And, why worry ?

That's ordinary human behavior - but is goes wrong in perverse ways – and people get into fights.

Not quite. Perhaps it shows the perverse ways in which whatever is meant by “ordinary humans behavior” does go wrong !

Are you still imagining your teen-year “fights” ? Nice coincidence that one of your loyal supporters also can’t get out of the school yard – even though he seems to seen light (only partially and just recently) and now, under some recent pressure, is desperately trying to go on-topic – something he rarely ever did before. [I’d call the pressure, a service to the forum at least in this case, if he tries to leave his school yard behind. ]

I was assigned to sort out how the fights happened - and how to reduce their incidence.

You’re NOT talking about being “assigned” to do it here on NYT’s MD forum , are you ? You think “fights" don’t happen on other forums ?

rshow55 - 09:13am Oct 9, 2003 EST (# 14723 of 14727)

The notions that people are able to use well, or at all, are characterized by patterns of order, symmettry, and fit to purpose (harmony) - and practically always what orders, relates, and fits in one way does not in most others. So you can always get into a fight about anything you choose. OR You can choose to construct more "shared space" - and actually build it. UNLESS Someone wants to fight.

Anything to do with MD science & related issues ? Specifically ? Or, are you re-visiting your teen-year fighting ?

rshow55 - 09:17am Oct 9, 2003 EST (# 14724 of 14727)

Why do people - in general and specifically - want to fight? ….

You gonna tell us again, right ? Still re-living your teen-year fighting ?

What's cheating? is a very good question - and it needs to be answered in ways that fit real human needs and vulnerabilities.

Ahem, to change the subject ?

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense