New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14529 previous messages)

lchic - 02:34pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14530 of 14539)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

SLIME SLIMING --- 'Vile or disgusting matter'

The 'Right' have been accused of resorting to the tactic of sliming.

  • (Krugeman - brilliant economist - NYT op-ed)
One notes the buckets full of it poured 'here' ... Soldier On Showalter

cantabb - 02:35pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14531 of 14539)

rshow55 - 12:28pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14515 of 14515)

Gisterme asked about oscillatory solutions in January - and I didn't get as far as I'd hoped. I'm thinking about doing better now. The relative silence of the board is something of a relief - it will take me a while to digest yesterday - and to respond in ways that fredmoore , at least, may find constructive.

More of the same. Dismissed before.

cantabb - 02:39pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14532 of 14539)

bluestar23 - 01:23pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14516 of 14528)

[To wrcooper}: thanks for the post..but I stilll think it's wrong to leave Showalter unmolested whilst he hijacks and raves insanely....he has no right to do what he does and be left alone for it....he should be banned regardless for abuse of the Forum...

See my response to wrcooper, above !

bluestar23 - 01:35pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14518 of 14528)

rshow: "The exercise of irresponsible power that I've been subjected to is significant - of long standing - and much that has happened is not to the credit of the Times.

bluestar23: Showalter now complains frequently....what is not "to the credit of the Times" is, of course, their refusal to ban Showalter...

Calling a spade a spade, seems to hurt even the spade.

His persecution paranoia, and his “Nash complex” [without realizing the HUGE difference].

lchic just follows her drummer. Doesn't like to hear that her "emperor" has no clothes [her own metaphor here, on an unelaed matte, from way back]

Some still don't realize that "It got understood and exposed."

jorian319 - 02:40pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14533 of 14539)
"Statements on frequently important subjects are interesting." -rshow55

I'm thinking about doing better now.

Good for you. Doing anything would be doing better - since for so long you've been doing nothing. (At least here)

cantabb - 02:45pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14534 of 14539)

lchic - 02:34pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14530 of 14532)

SLIME SLIMING --- 'Vile or disgusting matter'

The 'Right' have been accused of resorting to the tactic of sliming. (Krugeman - brilliant economist - NYT op-ed)

One notes the buckets full of it poured 'here' ... Soldier On Showalter

You mean Showalter's stuff ? That's what we see 'dumped' on here, his/her personal "dumpster' !

What he got in return was more than he [and you, a loyal soldier] had bargained for.

Believe it or not, you were right: "It got understood and exposed." Sure did in a hurry [at least since Sept 17]

jorian319 - 02:49pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14535 of 14539)
"Statements on frequently important subjects are interesting." -rshow55

Cantabb -

We have a looooong way to go before we've "dumped" on rshow as much as he has cumulatively "dumped" on us!

lchic - 02:54pm Oct 7, 2003 EST (# 14536 of 14539)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

" .... The thought of spending an entire year in such a hostile environment is almost too much to even comprehend. We have lived up to our end of the bargain, we have done our job, without the benefit of a clearly defined mission. The very least that we are owed is honesty ... "


More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense