New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14450 previous messages)

cantabb - 07:39pm Oct 6, 2003 EST (# 14451 of 14457)

jorian319 - 07:32pm Oct 6, 2003 EST (# 14448 of 14449)

Yeah. I admit to having fun posting pseudoprofundities and watching him go after them like carp on flakes. But it gets old, ....

I've seen you do that. You devil :)

I think you're doing the right thing. Who knows? Maybe even saving the world. :-)

I just asked him two basic questions: What he thinks he has been doing here with his "world asset," lchic, and where's the evidence of his claims ? And this has got him spinning in agony. Imagine.

cantabb - 07:40pm Oct 6, 2003 EST (# 14452 of 14457)

mazza9 - 07:33pm Oct 6, 2003 EST (# 14450 of 14451)

Cantabb: Accepted!

Thanks, Lou !

BTW Nemesis was an excellent novel!

:)

lchic - 07:47pm Oct 6, 2003 EST (# 14453 of 14457)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

I read a logic somewhere on the board that went:

Military Complex

Commissions (from)

(to) Foundations

(to) right wing foundation 'education'

(to) rote drivel brain washing

(to) career path through academia via right wing 'foundation' funding

(to) Power positions in right-wing establishment

(to) commission 'thinking'

(to) rejection of a wider world viewpoint

--------

Raises the quesiton that if much of the right wing educational way pertains back to Nazzi drivel ....

Would that be a valid reason to check on the history of establishment of some of these foundations (tax-payer paid 'commission') and redirect the financial base into areas of common provision - eg improved Health/Education chances 'poor' families.

------

Re-jig the 'system' for the national 'good' ... sounds logical and would benefit the whole of society.

------

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense