New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14309 previous messages)

cantabb - 05:07pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14310 of 14328)

rshow55 - 03:45pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14300 of 14302)

cont'd with overlap......

Cantabb objected to the illustration of multiple citation to these pieces. But I hope we agree that the pieces themselves are - focused - they do not "chase their tails." I think we have more to learn about how such focus comes into existence - and think we can learn more directly - proceeding along the lines of this thread. Cantabb doubts that. The issue involves convergence - and some questions about how dialog works that have been discussed - pretty steadily - for 2500 years. We now have new tools - and I think useful answers are within sight. Cantabb disagrees.

But I hope we do agree on the quality of the articles cited just above -in themselves.

You keep misrepresenting things. THis takes time to set right. One of the ways you distract the flow.

It’s YOU who, with an unverified fact-fiction mixture of “dots” and your insistence that going around in circles with them in a “loop test,” will be chasing your own tail. NOT others, including the cited authors.

lchic - 05:13pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14311 of 14328)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

USA 1999 statistic - 1609 gun deaths in just the 18-19 age group http://www.tincher.to/deaths.htm

Raises the question -

Why does a 'bodybag' from war-related-death have such an impact on the American psyche as compared to a death in the gutter

Preference Ignore Cantabb

cantabb - 06:56pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14312 of 14328)

lchic - 05:13pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14311 of 14311)

USA 1999 statistic - 1609 gun deaths in just the 18-19 age group http://www.tincher.to/deaths.htm

Raises the question -

Why does a 'bodybag' from war-related-death have such an impact on the American psyche as compared to a death in the gutter

NOTHING to do with MD ! As usual.

Just dragging whatever you find in the yard does NOT necessarily belong here on MD. You probably didn't get the memo ?

Preference Ignore Cantabb

But YOU are not going to be "Ignored" !

jorian319 - 07:10pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14313 of 14328)
"You know I'm an idiot like you know evolution is true" - - James Nienhuis

Hmmm.

Swirl of language indeed. A whirlwind of words. A vortex of verbiage. A tornado of tongues. A cyclone of semantics.

All in all, your posts, Robert, seem a hurricane of hubris.

rshow55 - 07:17pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14314 of 14328)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

from the script of Casablanca http://6nescripts.free.fr/Casablanca.pdf p. 92

Rick comes quickly up to Renault.

. Rick: How can you close me up. On what grounds?

. Renault: I am shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on here!

This display of nerve leaves Rick at a loss.

. - - - -

This thread has gone on a long time - http://www.mrshowalter.net/Sequential.htm - and usages cannot be accidental.

In Casablanca - it isn't made clear whether gambling is in violation of some ordinance. But it is clear that, de facto - it has gone on a long time.

13323 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.Ez8CbUQ4LsY.624741@.f28e622/15013

bluestar23 - 07:29pm Oct 4, 2003 EST (# 14315 of 14328)

rshow55:

"This thread has gone on a long time - http://www.mrshowalter.net/Sequential.htm - and usages cannot be accidental."

"In Casablanca - it isn't made clear whether gambling is in violation of some ordinance. But it is clear that, de facto - it has gone on a long time."

More from Neptune....."usages cannot be accidental"...."Casablanca"...? Well, I put paid to you, showalter; and informed the Mods. fully on your blatant hijacking of this Misssile Defense thread...

More Messages Recent Messages (13 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense