New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14269 previous messages)

rshow55 - 01:46pm Oct 3, 2003 EST (# 14270 of 14280)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Wishing Won't Make Star Wars So http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/03/opinion/03FRI3.html was a fine editorial, and on topic.

This thread has had a lot of technical discussion about missile defense -and one way to see that is to look at searchs - including old ones that relate to old citations archived at http://www.mrshowalter.net/

http://www.mrshowalter.net/optics_01.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/optics_02.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/optics_03.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/optics_04.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/optics_05.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/optics_06.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/optics_07.htm

http://www.mrshowalter.net/lasar_02.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/lasar_03.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/lasar_04.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/lasar_05.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/lasar_06.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/lasar_07.htm

This thread has covered a lot of ground about specifically technical issues in missile defense. It has also clarified disagreements about logic that seem to engage the emotions - and that are very practical. Applications of latent semantic analysis, a logically connected topic - are now multibillion dollar industries. .

12878 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.naIpbzZNL7W.380916@.f28e622/14554

84 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.naIpbzZNL7W.380916@.f28e622/99

Everybody has to worry about disagreements - and what others think and feel - and I do, but there are limits.

. What, Me Worry About Insults? By THOMAS VINCIGUERRA http://www.mrshowalter.net/What,%20Me%20Worry%20About%20Insults.htm

On checking questions of fact, I still think this is good. http://www.mrshowalter.net/ScienceInTheNewsJan4_2000.htm

I'm taking a rest, for a little while.

lchic - 04:11pm Oct 3, 2003 EST (# 14271 of 14280)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Phew!

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense