New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(14242 previous messages)
cantabb
- 11:40pm Oct 2, 2003 EST (#
14243 of 14250)
fredmoore - 11:16pm Oct 2, 2003 EST (# 14241 of
14241)
So nitpicking Rshow is constructive and an
'on Topic KAEP' is not?
ONCE AGAIN, asking him to tell us what he thinks he
has been working on for 2+ years here and what has he really
accomplished during this time, in relation to his global
claims is NOT "nitpicking." That's the crux of the problem:
something he has NOT yet been able to state coherently, other
than 'world peace' and big fihts/little fight and his own
tortured rationalizations. Much like your OWN in relation to
your defense of the continuing 'abuse' of this Forum and of
your object of admiration, rshow55.
On KAEP, first see how it conforms to the Forum header.
That's like saying a grain of dust is more
valuable than a diamond mine.
"Diamond mine" ? Wow ! Another 'unique' analogy. Do
you ever get out much, even DownUnder/Up above wherever you
are ?
Further, KAEP is on Topic because a
militarized space is Not inevitable, is Unnecessary,
although not impossible and I believe I the philosophy I
have expounded in KAEP has shown why. Hint ... that's part
of the forum header's mandate.
READ IT AGAIN. And, see if it fits in with the basic
purpose of this 'Science' forum. Just because you say so is
not worth much -- you are the one who has been justifying the
Forum abuse with highly irrelevant and personal stuff.
May also be time for you to see/realize how much the
"mandate" of this forum has been abused for this long and by
whom.
Find an argument that at least can stand up. School yard
can only take you so far out of its perimeter.
lchic
- 12:06am Oct 3, 2003 EST (#
14244 of 14250) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
When the animals walked '2by2' down the gangplank from the
arc all carried suitcases excepting the humans who had a
missile under each arm -- why so?
mazza9
- 12:43am Oct 3, 2003 EST (#
14245 of 14250) "Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic
Commentaries
I've got it!
RShow is over the edge. He is a bi-polar with multiple
personality disorder. Cantabb, FredMoore, Jorian### and I are
all Robert. Now I'm sure that LChic is completely confused,
even discounting her gender!, consequently.....Oops I lost my
place. What was I saying?
In any case, UFOs have landed in New Mexico and we are all
being subjected to global warming by aliens who are preparing
to invade once the atmosphere is saturated with CO2 and the
temperature of our planet is an average 175 degrees. (or
wasn't this the plot line of a recent movie?). I'm so
confused....Please pass the prozac... or anti zack...I don't
care.
lchic
- 05:54am Oct 3, 2003 EST (#
14246 of 14250) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
By jove
'he thinks'
he's got it!
lchic
- 06:28am Oct 3, 2003 EST (#
14247 of 14250) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Stars in the Whites of his eyes
rshow55
- 08:05am Oct 3, 2003 EST (#
14248 of 14250) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
This is an important piece:
Wishing Won't Make Star Wars So http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/03/opinion/03FRI3.html
And so are these:
'Slime and Defend' By PAUL KRUGMAN http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/03/opinion/03KRUG.html
Shaking the House of Cards By BOB HERBERT http://www.nytimes.com/2003/10/03/opinion/03HERB.html
This thread has been about details, and context - of
national defense - including missile defense.
(2 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|