New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (14049 previous messages)

fredmoore - 02:41am Sep 27, 2003 EST (# 14050 of 14055)

From: The Cambridge History of English and American Literature in 18 Volumes (1907–21). VOLUME XVII. Later National Literature, Part II. comes this extract on Lincoln's humour. In ways that are clear in the following text it seems to me this is a forum dedicated to the spirit of Lincoln and therefore above reproach. Few people in the world today would regard Lincoln, or anything about his life, to be in any way questionable.

XXII. Lincoln.

§ 8. Comic Writings.

Curiously enough it is to this period that his only comic writings belong. Too much has been said about Lincoln’s humour. Almost none of it has survived. Apparently it was neither better nor worse than the typical American humour of the period. Humorously, Lincoln illustrated as an individual that riotous rebound which so often distinguishes the nature predominantly melancholy; and as a type, he illustrates the American contentment with the externals of humour, with bad grammar, buffoonery, and ironic impudence. His sure taste as a serious writer deserts him at times as a reader. He shared the illusions of his day about Artemus Ward. When he tried to write humorously he did somewhat the same sort of thing—he was of the school of Artemus. 14 A speech which he made in Congress, a landmark in his development, shows the quality of his humour, and shows also that he was altogether a man of his period, not superior in many small ways to the standards of his period. The Congress of the United States has never been distinguished for a scrupulous use of its time; today, however, even the worst of Congressess would hardly pervert its function, neglect business, and transform itself into an electioneering forum, with the brazenness of the Congresses of the middle of the last century. In the summer of 1848, with Zachary Taylor before the country as the Whig nominee for president, Lincoln went the way of all flesh political, squandering the time of the House in a jocose electioneering speech, nominally on a point before the House, really having no connection with it—in fact, a romping burlesque of the Democratic candidate, Cass. As such things went at that day, it was capital. It was better than most such speeches because, granting the commonplace thing he had set out to do, Lincoln’s better sense of language gave even to his romp a quality the others did not have.

  • ******

    Further, it goes to show:

    You can complain about all of the people some of the time but you can't complain about all of the people all of the time.

    cantabb - 02:55am Sep 27, 2003 EST (# 14051 of 14055)

    fredmoore - 02:41am Sep 27, 2003 EST (# 14050 of 14050)

    Further, it goes to show:........

    Really ? Which version did you get DownUnder ?

    lchic - 03:48am Sep 27, 2003 EST (# 14052 of 14055)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Fred's more 'UpOver' than downunder!

    lchic - 06:47am Sep 27, 2003 EST (# 14053 of 14055)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Entente Cordiale

      By James Burke
    http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=00032F01-7913-1C71-9EB7809EC588F2D7

    focus on France and UK

    Shows how nations are inextricably linked by the forces of innovation.

    More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense