New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13338 previous messages)

almarst2002 - 01:09pm Aug 21, 2003 EST (# 13339 of 13345)

The PROBLEM is, those who think they are WISE and POWERFUL to SOLVE WORLD'S PROBLEMS usually end up in a HELL of their own CREATION.

Which would not be bad except they also take there an awfull lot of innocent people with them.

rshow55 - 01:12pm Aug 21, 2003 EST (# 13340 of 13345)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

References to a model of a Neu Man http://www.mrshowalter.net/What,%20Me%20Worry%20About%20Insults.htm

Thomas Friedman refers to "Spy Versus Spy" cartoons, now a part of the culture. March 30, 2001 http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md01000s/md1782.htm 4321 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/5464

5079 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f0ce57b/6104

5469 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/6842

6051 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/7526

A New Man I've linked on this thread many times has a face that has entered the culture, too. Paul Newman is a fuller, more multidimensional New Man.

Lchic 11554 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/13150

It's interesting to note how 'public figures' who have satisfied their own needs take the time to look to the needs of others - Buffet (Edu), Gates (Vaccinations/Edu), Turner (Peace), Newman -- Spaghetti sauce :)

Paul Newman Is Still HUD http://www.nytimes.com/2003/08/19/opinion/19NEWM.html shows concern for the needs of others - concerns for the needs of the world.

It is certain Paul Newman cares about nuclear weapons - as does Michael Douglas.

Paul Newman probably knew the Randy Newman song "Political Science." , that Thomas Friedman quotes here: http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md5000s/md5174

Paul Newman starred in Fat Man and Little Boy and wrote this letter http://www.childrenofthemanhattanproject.org/COLLECTIONS/MP-PFIL/Pages-2/MPP-PFIL-159.htm

(He's not only better looking than I am - he writes more sharply, too.)

1237 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/1580 dealt in part with a "tip" to contact Tom Hanks, and goes on . . .

The theatrical-literary-movie person I've been thinking of most, for an inital pitch, has been A.E. Hotchner, Paul Newman's partner and Newman's Own tycoon.

I referred to Joey Berlin's "low rent" contacts, (like Paul Newman and his sidekick A.E. Hotchner. ) in 6063 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/7538

I think that if Newman, Hotchner, or people they know, could get interested, just now, it might save millions of lives. (Or maybe, just for a joke, they'd beat the s*** out of me. ) Newman and "Newman's own friends" can do things that even The New York Times can't do - because they have different roles. I've been trying to get presentable to make a pitch, play a role for them. But I'm not as good as I'd like to be at my "game" - though I try. Like everybody else who has to show their work in public - I'm afraid of making mistakes. Though I keep at it.

1237 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/1580 of April 10, 2002 is followed by a bit of "role playing" between me, and a guy gisterme , who I often suspect is, or is close to, the President of the United States:

"Gisterme is a highly esteemed visiter to this thread - with hundreds of postings last year -but since March, an infrequent one. On 1:53 today I made a post that ends

" Just musing -- if I put on a suit, shined my shoes, and walked into the State Department - asking for permission to see some people -- what do you think might happen?

"I'd like to make a pitch to the Russian Embassy, and some other places, as well.

" 13 minutes later, gisterme posts. . . .

1232 1233 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.1iB0bCntAkQ.4626994@.f28e622/1577 are those posts.

Gisterme's posted a lot since, often in ways that show how seriously he plays the role of someone serving the interests of the President of the United States.

. . . .

Paul Newman reads high-toned magazines ( like The Nation ) and k

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense