New York Times Forums
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13161 previous messages)

rshow55 - 02:39pm Jul 27, 2003 EST (# 13162 of 13267)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

rshow55 - 11:21pm Jun 6, 2002 EST (#2477 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@167.Rz6XacALMTB^1081993@.f28e622/3097 , posted somewhat later, is interesting, too.

Pity the SEARCH capability has gone away again.

Whistle-Blower Recounts Faults Inside the F.B.I. By DAVID JOHNSTON and NEIL A. LEWIS http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/07/politics/07INQU.html

Coleen Rowley told Senators on Thursday that the F.B.I.'s bureaucracy discouraged innovation and punished agents seeking to cut through layers of gatekeepers.

I have no records -- nothing but circumstantial evidence to support what I say (though there are many ways to "collect the dots" and "connect the dots" and many ways to check, if effort is expended.) But I say again that my instructions from Bill Casey were that I was not even to attempt a "direct approach" to CIA - since my objective was to actually get something done. Casey told me, even after my head blew, to keep working - that I was working on problems of national importance. I was told that I would be watched, and that if I put, properly encoded but conspicuously placed, information saying I was making real progress - there would be a way to "bring me in." I was astonished, after doing the work, and posting http://www.mrshowalter.net/pap2 - -- that it didn't happen. A Modified Equation for Neural Conductance and Resonance http://xxx.lanl.gov/html/math-ph/9807015 But I had been told that I had to have reasoning that would "make it through the system" -- and Steve Kline and I worked very hard, within our geekish limitations, on polishing our reasoning.

(If only I'd known lchic at the time - we might have done much better. She has an artistic-associative gift we knew nothing of.)

I was also told that, if nothing else worked, my only real chance was to "come in through The New York Times ". I found out, and have continued to find out, that the NYT also has its "layers of gatekeepers." And has its gatekeeping procedures.

Even so, there have been times that I've thought that Bill Casey gave me his best judgement.

Other times, it seems to me that Casey simply couldn't bring himself to tell me that truth --- that there was no hope for me at all - - and just wanted to keep me working.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/07/politics/07INQU.html bears careful reading, and seems to me to be ominous, but a clear warning. How much more hopeful the world might be if people asked "what matters" -- clearly and competently enough. The stakes are so high that the question "what matters" matters for our decency and survival.

People of literary interest might find this sermon moving - as I do, and an aid to imagining, in human terms, the obligations and challenges we now face.

WHEN THE FOUNDATIONS ARE SHAKING ..... by Dr James Slatton . . . . River Road Church (Baptist) in Richmond, Va ...... http://www.mrshowalter.net/sermon.html

People of secular inclinations might want to skip the first 9:27 of the sermon . Thereafter, it tells the story of a Russian colonel, in the USSR's nuclear forces, who kept is head, and by doing so, kept nuclear war from destroying us all.

This contrasts, I feel, with another kind of "gatekeeping" and "logic keeping." - - - Not all Southern Baptists are the same MD158 rshow55 3/3/02 3:54pm

Bush 2000 Adviser Offered To Use Clout to Help Enron By Joe Stephens Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, February 17, 2002

" Just before the last presidential election, Bush campaign adviser Ralph Reed offered to help Enron Corp. deregulate the electricity industry by working his "good friends" in Washington and by mobilizing religious leaders and pro-family groups . . . http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A22380-2002F

More Messages Recent Messages (105 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense