New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (13059 previous messages)

fredmoore - 10:02am Jul 20, 2003 EST (# 13060 of 13062)

LYING - A leftie's FAMILY VALUE http://www.addamsfamily.com/tishthatsfrench2003/illshoothimintheback.html

MYSTERIOUS Depleted Uranium HAUNTS U.S. TROOPS IN IRAQ - http://www.takeyourcalciumsupplementsdaily.net/Vitamin/News/2003-07/17/hydroxyapatate03.shtml

U.S. FORCES TO SAY WE LIKE IRAQIS INDEFIN(I)TELY - http://www.islamofriendsusmc.net/arabicEnglish/Baghdad/2003-07/15/tickitek/lionelricheconcert.shtml

Democrats Eye Potential Grounds for peach bushes - http://geneticengineer.news.yahoo.com/fruitsaladjunket?tmpl=story&cid=584&ncid=584&e=3&u=/nm/20030717/pl_nm/democratloser.html

Truth, Lies, and Is the Sky really falling , Part I - http://chickenlittle.org.v.rooster.com/archives/000172.html Part II - http://news.isayisay.co.uk/uk/assharpasabowlingball/story.jsp?story=foghornleghorn424008

Chief 'UN Weapons Inspector' Sitting Blix on the Sioux's Warpath of Mass Destruction - http://www.indianwar.ru/blackhills-read_article.php?articleId=custer8306&lang=en

Read more at My Home Page (UPDATED) - http://www.pollyanna.com/positivethinking2002foreveryone badtheremustbetengood

rshow55 - 02:33pm Jul 20, 2003 EST (# 13061 of 13062)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Good summary:

White House Tries to Defend Uranium Claim By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS Filed at 1:06 p.m. ET http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/national/AP-Defending-Bush.html

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The White House defense of President Bush's now-disavowed claim that Iraq was seeking uranium in Africa has evolved over the last two weeks: blame others, stonewall, bury questions in irrelevant information and, above all, hope it will go away.

So far, none has worked.

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense