New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12993 previous messages)

fredmoore - 05:26pm Jul 13, 2003 EST (# 12994 of 13003)

There was Adventureland and Tomorrowland and Frontierland and:

Fantasyland ... The happiest kingdom of them all!

but wait ... there's more ... there's ....

Powerland .... the greatest aphrodisiac of them all!

Oh! And Neverland ... but we won't talk about that one.

To win your free steak knife:

What were the tags for the first three?

To win your free CD knife:

In what year will Disney create Komodoland ... the Gnarliest Kingdom of them all?

lchic - 05:28pm Jul 13, 2003 EST (# 12995 of 13003)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Looking back .... Looking forwards .. a timeline perspective

He's full of energy, which in some minds may raise the questions -
  • How much energy (worldwide) has been consumed in the past 4 decades?
  • How much energy will be required in the next 4 decades?
Let's check for varied energy resources ... how do they stack-up ... will we get throuch coming decades ... it's just that Alex way back made the point that much C20 conflict related directly to one factor
    E N E R G Y

rshow55 - 05:28pm Jul 13, 2003 EST (# 12996 of 13003)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Communication conventions sure do make a difference.

I think it is very good to have a mix of sexed in powerful roles.

There are more possibilities. Many creative possiblities.

lchic - 05:38pm Jul 13, 2003 EST (# 12997 of 13003)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

A recent relaxed and winning smile, from a VIP visiting Botswanaland, echoded, in Jumbo-Lingo that very sentiment

    I think it is very good to have a mix of sexed in powerful roles.

rshow55 - 05:49pm Jul 13, 2003 EST (# 12998 of 13003)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.A1CXbq3bpXW.1130642@.f28e622/14463

Issues of status, and priority, and the feelings involved, including jealousy, are important. Since I was commandeered by General Eisenhower in 1967 - I've been in some very awkward situations - with difficulties about issues of protocol and propriety

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.A1CXbq3bpXW.1130642@.f28e622/14146

Fredmoore , your last posting isn't nearly up to the standard of your 9425 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.A1CXbq3bpXW.1130642@.f28e622/10965

or gisterme's fine piece of writing titled "The Talking Dog" at 10:05pm Jan 17, 2003 EST (# 7768 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.A1CXbq3bpXW.1130642@.f28e622/9293 cited at 12049 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.A1CXbq3bpXW.1130642@.f28e622/13676

12295 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.A1CXbq3bpXW.1130642@.f28e622/13943 cites a professional piece of work, including a message in a bogus http form

http://check-this-you-mother/komodos-are-pretty.com

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Cancel Subscriptions  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense