New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12466 previous messages)

rshow55 - 08:13am Jun 11, 2003 EST (# 12467 of 12474)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I'm debriefing here, as carefully as I can - and in ways that I think are in the interest of the US, and the whole world. Trying to exercise some self censorship - for valid security reasons - and yet convey messages that are true and usable.

Very many of the problems that concerned Eisenhower, and C.P. Snow were written about carefully - and have attracted some notice (and some hostility) in my old parner's book

Kline, S.J. Conceptual Foundations for Multidisciplinary Thinking Stanford U. Press, 1995

#6983 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.6E36baoiedE.396979@.f28e622/11428

Hypothesis, Guidelines, Dicta, and Queries Appendix C of Conceptual Foundations for Multidisciplinary Thinking by Stephen Jay Kline Stanford University Press, 1995 HYPOTHESES

Hypothesis I: The possibility of multidisciplinary discourse. Meaningful multidisciplinary discourse is possible.

Hypothesis II: Honor all credible data...

#9883 - http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.6E36baoiedE.396979@.f28e622/11428

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/385 In Chapter 4, p 63, of Conceptual Foundations for Multidisciplinary Thinking , my old partner Steve Kline writes this:

" In very complex systems, such as sociotechnical systems, we have no theory of entire systems, and must therefore create, operate, and improve such systems via feedback: that is, repeated cycles of human observations plus trials of envisioned improvements in the real systems. In such very complex systems, data from a wide variety of cases therefore becomes the primary basis for understanding and judgements . ...

. . .

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7b085/393 puts the need for information into a simple, boiled-down investment decision form.

"We need much better procedures for checking facts that matter than we've got - and this board has largely been about that.

- - - -

That was STEVE's book, not mine, but we talked for more than a thousand hours about it. It contains, in the open literature - a great deal of "obvious" insight. It would be far more effective if it could be reworked, made graceful - made clearer - by someone with Lchic's gifts - but it is as clear as it is.

That book did not deal with some key issues - necessarily requiring explicit government involvement - that I (and later he) was involved in - and does not deal with issues of contradiction, repression, and exception handling that are essential.

But it is an extensive, very good body of work - and more people should read it.

I'm trying to be as careful as D.D. Eisenhower would have wanted - setting out information in ways that can be used - and not compromising information that could do harm without ample cause. Eisenhower handed me a copy of C.P. Snow's Science and Government at our first meeting - and talked about how important it would be to solve problems that could be defined physically and logically first - and then fitting the solutions into human institutions - effectively yet gracefully.

rshow55 - 08:18am Jun 11, 2003 EST (# 12468 of 12474)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

#3940 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.6E36baoiedE.396979@.f28e622/4964

"When I say that I think lchic and I are doing important work on "connecting the dots" - I mean "important, in my opinion, judging from what I know based on these references, some others like them, some thought and some experience."

What I mean is this - we are working - and have worked effectively - on the most important problems of human action and understanding that I've known to exist, and been able to express clearly enough that they could be worked on - after she has widened and clarified my knowledge, understanding, and connections.

I think Eisenhower would have been honored to see our results - C.P. Snow would have been too - and it has been an honor as well as a joy to work with her as a partner.

honor: http://www.hyperdictionary.com/dictionary?define=honor&Submit1=Search

lchic - 08:49am Jun 11, 2003 EST (# 12469 of 12474)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Two months after "liberating" Iraq, the Anglo-American authorities and their boss Paul Bremer - whose habit of wearing combat boots with a black suit continues to amaze his colleagues - have decided to control the new and free Iraqi press. - Robert Fisk 11June03 Independent

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense