New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12359 previous messages)

lchic - 04:52pm Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12360 of 12370)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Thus, while Eisenhower hewed closely to the broad outlines of the strategic plan he had enunciated before D-Day, he had no objection to deviations at the tactical level.

- His most enduring contribution was developing a sense of partnership and self-confidence among the NATO member nations. Europeans found that they could trust a man who conspicuously shared their desire for peace. Eisenhower believed that his NATO command was unique. It was the first time, as he later commented, that a multinational army was created "to preserve the peace and not to wage war."

- Eisenhower dedicated himself to the cause of peace and sought the national good as he conceived it during eight years in the White House. He won the trust and confidence of the common man, both in the United States and abroad, and personified the goodwill and altruism of American policy in his era. As soldier and as statesman, duty came first. Perhaps the best characterization of the man comes from his own words in a speech he delivered in June 1945, to acknowledge being awarded the Freedom of the City of London. "Humility," he said, "must always be the portion of any man who receives acclaim earned in the blood of his followers and the sacrifices of his friends."

lchic - 04:59pm Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12361 of 12370)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

PSAC - The Papers of the President's Science Advisory Committee, 1957-1961 microfilmed

http://www.aim25.ac.uk/cgi-bin/search2?coll_id=2643&inst_id=21

lchic - 05:00pm Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12362 of 12370)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Subjects Artificial satellites | Spacecraft | Scientific facilities Biological warfare | Warfare | Military engineering Chemical warfare | Warfare | Military engineering East West relations | International relations Military aircraft | Aircraft | Vehicles Missiles | Weapons | Military equipment Nuclear energy | Nonrenewable energy sources | Energy resources Nuclear weapons | Weapons | Military equipment Research councils | Scientific organizations | Science administration Science budgets | Science finance | Economics of science Space exploration | Space technology

lchic - 05:08pm Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12363 of 12370)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Historical Documentary Editions

http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/ade/nhprc/index.html

More Messages Recent Messages (7 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense