New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12346 previous messages)

lchic - 08:12am Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12347 of 12357)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" Later in his career, Abraham Maslow continued his thought on the hierarchy and further divided the fifth level of self-actualization into four different parts. He assumed four things of self actualized people: they are

  • 1) being problem focused
  • 2) incorporating an ongoing freshness of appreciation of life
  • 3) concerned about personal growth, and
  • 4) able to have peak experiences.
Based on these assumptions, he created four more levels.
  • Instead of the fifth level being simply self-actualization, he named it cognitive: to know, to understand, and to explore.
  • The sixth level is the aesthetic: the pursuit of symmetry, order, and beauty.
  • The seventh level is self-actualization: to find self fulfillment and realize one's potential.
  • The eighth and final level is transcendence: to help others find self fulfillment and realize their own potential.

    lchic - 08:34am Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12348 of 12357)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Transcendence: to help others find self fulfillment and realize their own potential

    ?

  • Mentoring

    rshow55 - 08:48am Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12349 of 12357)
    Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

    2737 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.kIb4bXFWdb0.563907@.f28e622/3409

    Berle and Maslow: MD667-8 rshow55 3/18/02 12:13pm http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.kIb4bXFWdb0.563907@.f28e622/826

    search Maslow, this thread.

    9675 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.kIb4bXFWdb0.563907@.f28e622/11216

    I was asked to look for stability conditions in what Kline later called "sociotechnical systems" - and asked to find end games that resulted in stable, efficient, humane function by Eisenhower.

    Berle's Laws of Power, Maslow's Needs, and the Golden Rule as a symmettry condition are essential requirements for stable solutions.

    rshow55 - 09:05am Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12350 of 12357)
    Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

    D.D. Eisenhower was also deeply interested in strictly military issues - and issues directly connected to military issues. It was felt I had some aptitude for these.

    I was asked to do work - including some very applied work, with demonstrations - on the relationships between human capacities, weapons, military organization, tactics, strategic interactions - and problems of negotiation and maintenance of stable relations between nation states. I had some background, involving fighting, that had impressed some people - and solved some military problems of wide interests to commanders - especially technical aspects of the question: "how do you effectively engage superior forces?"

    Insofar as possible, I was asked to actually do anything and everything I talked about "with authority." It wasn't an "academic" education. It involved some real physical danger, as well as stress, for me, and sometimes for my instructors and others.

    Making peace was an unsolved and technical problem - as well as a moral problem. That's still true. I've made some progress on that problem - and have tried to communicate that progress, as well as I can within format constraints, and within my own limitations, on this thread.

    Eisenhower, and many around him, were not at all sure how the world was going to survive. In the movie Thirteen Days there's some realistic dramatisation of what the feelings were.

    The issues that were of concern then are still unsolved - still concerns - though of course a lot has changed.

    lchic - 09:49am Jun 6, 2003 EST (# 12351 of 12357)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    http://www.ceip.org/cuban-missile-crisis/learnmore.htm

    More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense