New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (12273 previous messages)

lchic - 09:09am Jun 2, 2003 EST (# 12274 of 12280)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

North Korea Chronology

Follow key events in North Korea's history, from the beginning of the Korean War to the present.

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/transcripts/s870388.htm

NK - Transcript - FLASHPOINT KOREA

Flashpoint Korea : North Korea declares it now has nuclear weapons. Can the world stop the Hermit State selling nuclear materials to terrorists, or triggering an arms race in north east Asia?

http://www.abc.net.au/4corners/content/2003/20030602_korea/default.htm (full transcript)

lchic - 09:12am Jun 2, 2003 EST (# 12275 of 12280)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Right now, Rupert Murdoch is simultaneously campaigning on three continents to overturn laws protecting media diversity. These laws are under review not only in Australia but in Britain and America.

A week or so ago, Murdoch was having a tough time in Washington trying to convince the senators he wouldn’t take advantage of relaxed American laws.

Mr Murdoch: I certainly have no plans for anything other than what I have before you today. Background noise: [laughter] [Mr Chairman] [laughter]

- Pacsat 31 May 2003

http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s870238.htm

lchic - 09:14am Jun 2, 2003 EST (# 12276 of 12280)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Free speech groups in the US are even more sceptical of Murdoch’s motives. Last weekend, they launched a scare campaign to preserve America’s cross-media ownership rules.

This man wants to control the news in America. The FCC wants to help him. Next week, the Federal Communications Commission plans to sweep away ownership restrictions that, for three decades, have guaranteed at least minimal competition and diversity of opinions on the public airwaves. - ad in New York Times Take a look »

The FCC is due to vote on the changes in Washington in a few hours time. The Murdochs are coy about their ambitions but one thing is as clear here as it is in America: they want more. They always have.

2003 http://www.abc.net.au/mediawatch/transcripts/s870238.htm

lchic - 09:23am Jun 2, 2003 EST (# 12277 of 12280)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Headers


More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense