New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11965 previous messages)

lchic - 07:32am May 25, 2003 EST (# 11966 of 11992)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Were Dickens still alive, and were he to visit encampments holding prisoners, and military prisoners, and were he to witness the inhumanity within ....

In dickensian style

I wonder what and how he would write --- he usually 'got results' in terms of social reform ...

Is there any such media performer-writer today?

lchic - 09:10am May 25, 2003 EST (# 11967 of 11992)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Democracy and human rights

http://www.shrc.org/english/index.shtml Syria http://www.hrw.org/backgrounder/mena/saudi/ Saudi

lchic - 09:21am May 25, 2003 EST (# 11968 of 11992)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

84000 pieces of Colombia ( 80% retrieved ) are shelved in a hanger at Kenedy Space Centre

lchic - 09:32am May 25, 2003 EST (# 11969 of 11992)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The era of surrogate astronauts is over:

http://ham.spa.umn.edu/kris/animals.html

rshow55 - 09:38am May 25, 2003 EST (# 11970 of 11992)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.AZ2nbOS2apJ.1795904@.f28e622/13591 Is there any such media performer-writer today?

Dickens had a disciplined heart - and he could be funny, too.

Matching Dickens today?

-- You might need a team. And a nearly movie sized budget. I'd nominate Mel Brooks or anyone he'd highly recommend as a substitute - consulting especially the people cited in Defending the Right Not to Have a Nice Day By WARREN ST. JOHN http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/25/fashion/25GRUM.html

But for the actual writing - you'd need an astounding artist - ideally, this time, a female one. With the intellect of Erica Goode, Emily Eakin, and Natalie Angier all rolled into one - and a lot of moxie and grace.

Wouldn't be easy to find.

Funny and graceful and in touch with a wide audience is hard.

Looking at Friedman's piece ME - looking for 'truth' Friedman's piece today http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/25/opinion/25FRIE.html I recall a quote delivered to me at a very painful time - when I'd screwed up, and there was no help for it. It was from Oscar Wilde, referring to a great hit of his day, Uncle Tom's Cabin :

"A man would have to have a heart of stone - - to read of the death of little Annie --- without laughing.

A new Dickens would have to see the humor of that - and stay warm.

jorian319 - 09:45am May 25, 2003 EST (# 11971 of 11992)

Wow, lunachick:

30 posts since yesterday. You sure have a lot to say. To SOMEONE....???

Quality vs. quantity - who's to judge?

I guess only the reader...

I usually scan this thread for posts by anyone other than the usual three suspects, and find a gratifyingly higher average quality.

lchic - 09:47am May 25, 2003 EST (# 11972 of 11992)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Itemized database of approximately 43,000 Einstein and Einstein-related archival items: writings, professional & personal correspondence

http://www.alberteinstein.info/

More Messages Recent Messages (20 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense