New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11855 previous messages)

lchic - 10:29pm May 21, 2003 EST (# 11856 of 11881)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Russia France Germany -- get on board with Bush re future development of Iraq

US no longer regarded as an autistic superpower

UN involved

US has defined responsibilities

lchic - 12:22am May 22, 2003 EST (# 11857 of 11881)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Ro_tten you've spammed that previously!

lchic - 12:26am May 22, 2003 EST (# 11858 of 11881)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Iraqi folks are non too happy with the US army ... who 'march' into their bedrooms just before daylight!

lchic - 12:29am May 22, 2003 EST (# 11859 of 11881)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

'' Indonesian forces were yesterday accused of massacring civilians during a raid against separatist guerillas in Aceh province on Monday. The 18 killings, which included the reported shooting at point-blank range of two 12-year-old boys, happened during dawn raids in four villages in Bireuen district, villagers alleged.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/indonesia/Story/0,2763,960904,00.html

lchic - 08:40am May 22, 2003 EST (# 11860 of 11881)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

.... the leader of the opposition in Zimbabwe was currently on trial for treason based on English law.

Mr Robertson was opposing an attempt by the attorney general, Lord Goldsmith, to halt the newspaper's challenge to the 1848 Treason Felony Act, which makes it a criminal offence, punishable by life imprisonment, to advocate abolition of the monarchy in print, even by peaceful means.

Lord Goldsmith is appealing to the House of Lords against a ruling by three appeal court judges last year that the paper should be allowed to argue its case in the high court for a reinterpretation of the Treason Felony Act in the light of human rights law. Though last used in 1883, the act remains on the statute book.

The Guardian's challenge to the act followed the launch of its campaign in 2000 for the establishment of a republic by peaceful means in the UK.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/monarchy/story/0,2763,961095,00.html

rshow55 - 09:56am May 22, 2003 EST (# 11861 of 11881)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I care about lchic's postings - they're very good.

Lchic (in older postings, lunarchick) makes postings that very often predate articles in the NYT and other media. She's a leader. Also one of the first rate minds around.

Few people anywhere condense and summarize as well as she - or see so many good connections.

Yesterday I made some postings - from 11846-11850 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.64dYapV0b3D.1332202@.f28e622/13460 that ought to matter to people who are proud to read (or write in) the New York Times. I appreciated lchic's excellent following question:

lchic - 08:25pm May 21, 2003 EST (# 11851

Showalter - when Casey said 'come in throught the NYT ... did he give you a picture of the 'back door' or 'the front' .. if the latter does it have a brass knocker with a komodo dragon on it?

Casey and I had a very high opinion of the New York Times - and didn't expect some problems that have happened.

11623 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.64dYapV0b3D.1332202@.f28e622/13231

- - I want to think carefully, and answer Lchic's question well.

More Messages Recent Messages (20 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense