New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(11761 previous messages)
rshow55
- 02:57pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11762 of 11791) Can we do a better job of finding
truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have
done and worked for on this thread.
Real, sustained work between people and organizations is
only stable and comfortable with a reasonable balancing of
books in terms of status and money.
If a project needed political support - as an essential
fact - how would people involved in the project reasonably pay
and praise people who helped with the political power
involved?
Is there an answer, in the 21st century, that would not be
called "corrupt"? Is there an answer, in the 21st century that
"the average reader of The New York Times" would approve of?
The answers that Leland Stanford would have known, and felt
reasonably comfortable with, have now all been forbidden.
How would you build a railroad system - or some other
enterprise with similar problems - today?
Unless there are affirmative answers that can actually
apply to large scale conduct - a great deal that might
otherwise be possible is classified out of existence.
Issues of social control, and fairness, and transparency
are essential here - and better answers than the ones involved
in the building of the railroads need to be found if some
otherwise "easy" jobs are to get done.
lchic
- 05:39pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11763 of 11791) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
energy food water clothing shelter are the big basics
lchic
- 05:41pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11764 of 11791) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
I was surprised to read how those 'boots&all' NYT
staffers said they felt powerless within their own
organisational structure ....
lchic
- 09:25pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11765 of 11791) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
UK study on POLITICIANS found that much of the time they
lie and deceive because
Raises the point as to who
stands for election and their qualities (?)
lchic
- 09:33pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11766 of 11791) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Achen Indonesia will be decimated this afternoon!
- - - - -
Bagdhad -- a local municipal '''community model''' needs to
be installed -- fast -- put the money in via the women - why
not?!
Two looting carJackers 'shot' DEAD!
Chaos ORDER symetry Harmony ....
- - - - - -
lchic
- 09:33pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11767 of 11791) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
The culture of accountability
Strathclyde's Dr glenNewie -- studied lying
says
" Lying is to Democracy
what
Manure is to rhubarb "
UK gvt suffering MELTDOWN re credibilty
Has put an apparatus into place now to study and double
check the VIABILITY of stories.
lchic
- 09:37pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11768 of 11791) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
The FRENCH government is doublechecking for lies and truth
in it's supposed dealings with the USA
The Brits are checking
Politicians MUST BE CHECKED according to study above
The NYT has had to start to consider 'checking'
Showalter says repeatedly 'check me' ... but no one checks
Showalter --- raising the question --- why isn't the Showalter
histoire 'checked'? He's just a worker for the world's common
good afterall.
lchic
- 09:50pm May 18, 2003 EST (#
11769 of 11791) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Checking - artifacts Iraq
Australia asks for a comprehensive LIST from Iraq so that
any items coming here can be identified at the ports and
returned to Iraq.
(22 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|