New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11761 previous messages)

rshow55 - 02:57pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11762 of 11791)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Real, sustained work between people and organizations is only stable and comfortable with a reasonable balancing of books in terms of status and money.

If a project needed political support - as an essential fact - how would people involved in the project reasonably pay and praise people who helped with the political power involved?

Is there an answer, in the 21st century, that would not be called "corrupt"? Is there an answer, in the 21st century that "the average reader of The New York Times" would approve of?

The answers that Leland Stanford would have known, and felt reasonably comfortable with, have now all been forbidden.

How would you build a railroad system - or some other enterprise with similar problems - today?

Unless there are affirmative answers that can actually apply to large scale conduct - a great deal that might otherwise be possible is classified out of existence.

Issues of social control, and fairness, and transparency are essential here - and better answers than the ones involved in the building of the railroads need to be found if some otherwise "easy" jobs are to get done.

lchic - 05:39pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11763 of 11791)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

energy food water clothing shelter are the big basics

lchic - 05:41pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11764 of 11791)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

I was surprised to read how those 'boots&all' NYT staffers said they felt powerless within their own organisational structure ....

lchic - 09:25pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11765 of 11791)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

UK study on POLITICIANS found that much of the time they lie and deceive because

    They JUST CAN'T HELP IT!
Raises the point as to who stands for election and their qualities (?)

lchic - 09:33pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11766 of 11791)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Achen Indonesia will be decimated this afternoon!

- - - - -

Bagdhad -- a local municipal '''community model''' needs to be installed -- fast -- put the money in via the women - why not?!

Two looting carJackers 'shot' DEAD!

Chaos ORDER symetry Harmony ....

- - - - - -

lchic - 09:33pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11767 of 11791)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The culture of accountability

Strathclyde's Dr glenNewie -- studied lying

says

" Lying is to Democracy

what

Manure is to rhubarb "

UK gvt suffering MELTDOWN re credibilty

Has put an apparatus into place now to study and double check the VIABILITY of stories.

lchic - 09:37pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11768 of 11791)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

  • The FRENCH government is doublechecking for lies and truth in it's supposed dealings with the USA

  • The Brits are checking

  • Politicians MUST BE CHECKED according to study above

  • The NYT has had to start to consider 'checking'

  • Showalter says repeatedly 'check me' ... but no one checks Showalter --- raising the question --- why isn't the Showalter histoire 'checked'? He's just a worker for the world's common good afterall.

    lchic - 09:50pm May 18, 2003 EST (# 11769 of 11791)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Checking - artifacts Iraq

    Australia asks for a comprehensive LIST from Iraq so that any items coming here can be identified at the ports and returned to Iraq.

    More Messages Recent Messages (22 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense