New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11737 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:39am May 17, 2003 EST (# 11738 of 11742)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

On September 25 I had an all day web meeting with "beckq" under circumstances where I had some quite good reasons to suspect that "beckq" was the President of the United States, or someone close to him. I think people looking at my records for the weeks preceeding that meeting would agree that that I was making a reasonable inference about that. Here is that web meeting. If I was being elliptical - I felt that I was doing what I was supposed to do, considering the promises about classification that I had made.

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md266.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md273.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md280.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md290.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md300.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md00100s/md304.htm

That all day web-meeting ended with this

rshowalt - 05:28pm Sep 25, 2000 EST (#304 of 11890)

I'd be grateful for a chance to come before you, or one or more of your representatives, and explain, in detail, with documentation and ways to check, how dangerous this situation is. Especially if a good reporter, and a videotape record, were there so what was said was clear.

Some mistakes have been made, and you and I weren't very old when they were made. They can be fixed. A lot of things would improve if this were done. They are American mistakes, and Americans, and American leaders, have to fix them.

- - - - - - - - - -

I have a great deal of respect for the US government. And a great deal of respect for the New York Times as well.

But all the same, I think the fact that my circumstances have been as awkward as they have been in the time since raises some questions - and not only questions about me.

Almarst , over the years, has pointed out some problems related to those questions.

lchic - 03:38pm May 17, 2003 EST (# 11739 of 11742)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law

  • respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
  • or abridging the freedom of speech,
  • or of the press;
  • or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to

  • petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

    lchic - 03:43pm May 17, 2003 EST (# 11740 of 11742)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Palestine

    "" US's occupation in each of the Arab states is the only radical method to settle these contradictions. But this is rather a fantastic idea.

    Vasily Bubnov

    http://english.pravda.ru/world/20/93/375/10007_palestine.html

    lchic - 04:12pm May 17, 2003 EST (# 11741 of 11742)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    ""He went off to Congress an' served a spell, fixin' up the Govern'ments an' laws as well. [He] took over Washin'ton so we heered tell, an' patched up the crack in the Liberty Bell. Davy, Davy Crockett, seein' his duty clear!

    http://www.zacharymayo.com/zachary.nsf/3ff8c8ecbe087a7b86256a280076cdad/39d162c3bc0d879986256abb0012a524?OpenDocument

    Raises the question

  • 'who can see clearly now?'

    How many can claim to have been born in

  • 'greenest state in the land of the free'

    Showalter makes valid points regarding 'freedom' in this and following posts:

    http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.TpuCaUkNa5K.0@.f28e622/13346

    lchic - 05:04pm May 17, 2003 EST (# 11742 of 11742)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Bremer "What he knows about Iraq could not quite fill a thimble. What he knows about any part of the world would not fill a thimble."

    http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.4a9132b0/9

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense


    Enter your response, then click the POST MY MESSAGE button below.
    See the
    quick-edit help for more information.

    Message: