New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11573 previous messages)

rshow55 - 06:35pm May 10, 2003 EST (# 11574 of 11584)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Commondata and Lchic have asked me some very good questions - and I'm working on putting them in a context that I feel could be, and should be checked. Not that high ranking people such as Howell Raines ever look at this thread - but if such people did - I'd want them to be able to look at the response, and be interested.

In the car last trip, I listened to the audiotape of A Civil Action by Johathan Harr ( Vintage Books )

By the courtroom standards so well depicted in that book - especially with the resources I can command - and the special advantages classification gives the government - I have to ask -

"What could I prove about my relation to Casey, that would stand up in court?

The answer is "not much."

That's giving me pause.

I'm also asking how easy, by court usages, it would be to discredit me. Maybe pretty easy.

That's also giving me pause.

Going through my personal history since 1966 also includes some wrenching things - and I'm not proud of everything I've done - not by a long shot. That's also giving me pause.

Though I'm proud of a good deal - including a lot of the work on this thread.

The points I'd most like to make are independent of my relationship with Casey.

Perhaps people want to "call me Ismael".

Basic points on this thread remain.

rshow55 - 06:37pm May 10, 2003 EST (# 11575 of 11584)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Lchic , I can't get to your email today, which is unusual. Mine is still blocked.

I'm off for the night, for a movie and a meal.

Tried to call, and missed you.

rshow55 - 06:40pm May 10, 2003 EST (# 11576 of 11584)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

lchic cites

http://www.economist.com/science/displayStory.cfm?story_id=1763552

The days of silicon-based memory may be numbered.

And silicon-based memory is already very good - in terms of what people need memory for. If 100 - 1000 - 10000 times more memory becomes available - the difference in what people can do won't increase nearly in proportion. We have very good answers memory problems now.

mazza9 - 07:04pm May 10, 2003 EST (# 11577 of 11584)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

North Korea did not live up to the "agreement" fashioned by Clinton and Carter. They lied and cheated!

North Korea has been the one to issue bellicose statements about nucing US cities and testing, using and exporting WMDs. I, for one, would rather that mankind proceed in an intellectual fashion. My thoughts at the Space Exploration forum are very explicit about where my values reside.

North Korea does not deserve anymore respect and understanding than the common, ordinary street mugger! I don't belong to the NRA but the example of the kook mother that took her own son hostage shows how the issue should be dealt with. If you threaten my child, you're toast!

lchic - 07:22pm May 10, 2003 EST (# 11578 of 11584)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

China can deal with NK - wave the pointed finger ... meaningfully.

Seems China is NK's BIG supplier.

Thinking of SARS - how well would NK cope were it to run riot?

Mazza what's a KOOKED_MOTHER ... is May 11th KookedMother'sDay down your way? How weird are the cultural_customs in Texas?

lchic - 07:27pm May 10, 2003 EST (# 11579 of 11584)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Remembering Saddam --- the sensible thing for him to have done would have been to QUIT -- he didn't ... rather his love of his country was such that he preferred to see it stormed, burnt, ravaged along with many many unnecessary deaths. Logic and reason failed to penetrate his 'brain'.

So the question with NK is whether, or not, it can move into modernity along a smooth course - rather than via CHAOS and shambles!

More Messages Recent Messages (5 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense