New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11553 previous messages)

lchic - 08:48am May 10, 2003 EST (# 11554 of 11566)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Matchbox collection

http://www.edge-inc.net/cars/index.cfm/page/one/id/156/t/exoticsportscars.htm

fredmoore - 09:13am May 10, 2003 EST (# 11555 of 11566)

Hang the T-shirt ... Love that 90 Ferrari F50 .... Brmmm Brmmm .... Oooh yeah!!

lchic - 09:13am May 10, 2003 EST (# 11556 of 11566)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Maslow http://www.elliottsamazing.com/maslow.html

lchic - 09:34am May 10, 2003 EST (# 11557 of 11566)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

It's interesting to note how 'public figures' who have satisfied their own needs take the time to look to the needs of others - Buffet (Edu), Gates (Vaccinations/Edu), Turner (Peace), Newman -- Spaghetti sauce :)

It seems that Casey set Showalter on a problem solving course that was ultimately designed to show how it was possible to give the 'free world' higher improved living standards - as compared to the then closed world of communism.

Raised baseline standards haven't yet come to pass. When answers are possible, then, the question is why hasn't the world worked together to raise 'the lot' of humanity.

Showalter would say that the (Casey) 'will' to give all the people of the world a higher, decent baseline of existence has to be regenerated.

Perhaps all nations need to take out an R&D_insurance_policy that they pay into for a couple of decades in the expectation that at the end of that time improvements of provision can be attained via optimal engineering with the implementation of economies of scale, to give affordable energy, adequate shelter and food with a clean and plentiful water supply.

Showalter assures us that the solutions are to hand - needing funding for technical development - from Governments and private sources. So why isn't it happening?

lchic - 09:43am May 10, 2003 EST (# 11558 of 11566)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The economy that's growing fastest in the world today is __________________

http://www.sbp.org.pk/publication/Qreports.htm

rshow55 - 11:21am May 10, 2003 EST (# 11559 of 11566)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

As a minimum, I'd need an agreement, in writing or otherwise usable in bureacratic circumstances, about what the government would let me use of my work, and what it would restrict.

If I could get past that - there might be fairly straighforward answers to

So why isn't it happening?

Based on my past experience, that level of clearance might be enough.

lchic - 11:29am May 10, 2003 EST (# 11560 of 11566)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Showalter - much of your output has been financed by yourself, family, wife, with encouragement and assistance from intellectual partners ....

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense