New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11503 previous messages)

lchic - 02:12am May 8, 2003 EST (# 11504 of 11510)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

STUMPERS - <a href="/webin/WebX?14@13.WMY6atw98me.2214016@.f2e4e35/1550">wangzhong0 "Science in the News" 5/7/03 8:09pm</a>

Showalter if of the persuasion that most of the world's problems can be solved!

China's unsloved problems are bringing the GlobalEconomy to it's knees

  • Travel
  • International Education
  • Factory production - down
  • Need for minimum standards re Sanitation
  • Need for usable MORE water & recycling
  • A Demand for infrastructure suited to needs

    Australia's economy has high involvement with the Chinese re Travel, accommodation, & education.

    lchic - 02:14am May 8, 2003 EST (# 11505 of 11510)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Stumpers see Science in the News posting (repost)

    http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@13.WMY6atw98me.2214016@.f2e4e35/1550

    lchic - 02:16am May 8, 2003 EST (# 11506 of 11510)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Showalter is of the opinion that most of the world's problems CAN be solved. Erata (repost)

    ____________________________________________

    lchic - 02:19am May 8, 2003 EST (# 11507 of 11510)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Do it once, and do it right !!

    The first hydrogen car produced in batches has already been demonstrated by BMW

    http://www.bellona.no/en/energy/hydrogen/17973.html

    commondata - 02:22am May 8, 2003 EST (# 11508 of 11510)

    First of all rshow, hello and good tidings to you. I read Kristof's piece a couple of days ago and whenever someone writes of Casey I think of you. Kristof said:

    The C.I.A. was terribly damaged when William Casey, its director in the Reagan era, manipulated intelligence to exaggerate the Soviet threat in Central America to whip up support for Ronald Reagan's policies. Now something is again rotten in the state of Spookdom.

    I know that you identify heavily with our poor departed Bill, that you have good and bad things to say about him, and I dug out some of what you've said in the recent past ...

    Oct 11, 2002 03:40 pm And these men were intellectuals - Casey, most days, was surely as smart as I've been on my very best days - - and more widely read.

    Oct 12, 2002 10:30 am There is much to be said against Casey - and Kissinger, too - but they were among the most brilliant, hard working and successful men of their time

    Dec 10, 2002 01:01 pm Me, I'm wondering what Casey would think, and want - if he looked at things now. He might think the sort of things going on on this thread were working pretty well.

    Dec 24, 2002 06:24 pm Casey was a "closet intellectual" - and I was his "experimental animal" in ways we both understood - and the motivations for the work seemed sufficient to justify a lot - to both of us...

    Dec 31, 2002 08:57 am Casey was doing just the best he could. And from where he was, the logic that "sometimes you have to kill people" seemed compelling to him. And to me...

    Dec 31, 2002 09:13 am I have a lot of professional and personal respect for Casey, and the way he did his jobs. With some reservations, of course.

    More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense