New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11376 previous messages)

lchic - 11:44pm Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11377 of 11500)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Would there be a 'record' of this ?

http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?50@@.4a91190b/0

Would there be a 'record' of this ?

lchic - 06:31am Apr 21, 2003 EST (# 11378 of 11500)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

North - South - Korea - talk April 27-9

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=399033

lchic - 06:33am Apr 21, 2003 EST (# 11379 of 11500)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Hollywood revives McCarthyist climate by silencing and sacking war critics By Andrew Gumbel in Los Angeles 21 April 2003

Hollywood is often depicted in the US media as a hotbed of anti-government dissent and left-wing politics but that is not how it feels to Ed Gernon.

Mr Gernon was, until recently, a television producer at CBS responsible for a four-part miniseries on Hitler's rise to power, which will be shown next month. He thought the timing was apt, and said so in an interview with TV Guide magazine. "It basically boils down to an entire nation gripped by fear, who ultimately chose to give up their civil rights and plunged the whole nation into war," he said. "I can't think of a better time to examine this history than now."

That was far too strong for Leslie Moonves, CBS's chief executive, who promptly fired him. No reasons were given, although politics and a strong desire not to fall foul of the Bush administration apparently had plenty to do with it.

Another person who does not find Hollywood particularly liberal these days is http://news.independent.co.uk/world/politics/story.jsp?story=399024

lchic - 06:40pm Apr 21, 2003 EST (# 11380 of 11500)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

SARS - Showalter everyone's beginning to get your point about telling 'truth' ... seems to be important wrt developing strategies that enable the survival of the Human Race. Puts nuclear toys in the waste bin.

the 'correct' number of SARS cases in Beijing was 339, not 37

http://www.guardian.co.uk/sars/story/0,13036,940372,00.html

lchic - 06:42pm Apr 21, 2003 EST (# 11381 of 11500)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Were non-affected areas to impose a quarentine of 10 days for the incoming - it might keep them SARS free .... especially if they were Islands .... Australia has a chance to get on the SARS survival map.

lchic - 09:49pm Apr 21, 2003 EST (# 11382 of 11500)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Sugar industry threatens to scupper WHO World:

    The sugar industry in the US is threatening to bring the World Health Organisation to its knees by demanding that Congress end its funding unless the WHO scraps guidelines on healthy eating.

bbbuck - 10:47pm Apr 21, 2003 EST (# 11383 of 11500)

Thanks rubeburg, without U it would be nothing but lchickie.

Good job partner.

I know as a member of the science forum I am proud to call you friend and fellow forumite. How's the chip doing?

fredmoore - 11:04pm Apr 21, 2003 EST (# 11384 of 11500)

Buck ....

As Jackie Gleason would say "How sweeet it is!"

More Messages Recent Messages (116 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense