New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (11369 previous messages)

bbbuck - 09:58am Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11370 of 11500)

11367 - ROT - you're a spam poster ....!

That coming from luuneychic.

Give us some 10 posts in a row of luuney slop please.

Well at least I got to see rob-chiphead-boy can get worked up over some things. Good for you sir. Keep spamming apparently no admin inspectors have checked here yet.

Has the Bush team found the WMD yet? Why don't we go after China? They've manhandled millions of people.

lchic - 04:55pm Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11371 of 11500)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Japan - fact or fiction

They :

  • race to get a 'place' at uni .... arriving mentally exhausted ... they pay no attention - rather throwing paper aeroplanes around - later walking into pre-promised job

  • can't innovate - rather buy patents to develop on - transistor

  • overpay for 'elsewhere' real estate

  • endure 'loss of face'

  • find it hard to 'cut to truth'

  • are very slow in move to transparency

  • were people-rich (initially)

  • were capital poor (utilised Operations Management initiatives to maximise output)

  • took the electronics market from the 'bottom up' ie from 'lowest priced base items'

    -----------

    So moving to Iraq

    Iraq - fact or fiction

    They:

  • are educated

  • often have English

  • are seen as being in advance of the arab world

    .... can you add to this Fred ?

    lchic - 05:10pm Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11372 of 11500)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    Reading accounts of 'employed' iraqis who were seemingly 'pleased to be waged' for the purpose of mutilating and murdering fellow citizens --- what 'standards' of conduct for individuals does the UN offer?

    fredmoore - 06:51pm Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11373 of 11500)

    .... can you add to this Fred ?

    Well let's go Japanese first.

    In your generalisation characterization (GC) ... you were nowhere nearenough to the truth.

    I recall it was also said of the Japanese:

    They are all short and have poor vision.

    Will not fight at night or in jungles.

    would never attack Singapore from Malaya.

    Etc etc.

    We need to connect the dots more carefully and with greater scope so we can gain the necessary order, harmony and symmetry of a fuller understanding.

    Of all the dots you missed, the MOST important dot is the fact that Japan spends over 3% of its GDP on R and D. If Australia for example, matched this, instead of spending a paltry .3% GDP it would actually become a CLEVER country instead of just pontificating about it.

    As for Iraq, it is too early to see beyond the media flurry of absorbtion in ugly negative aspects of the butterfly emerging from its cocoon. Birth is not a pretty site, especially under the glare of the entire mass media of the planet. However, those with a ken for life, like every mother on the planet and the Tony Blairs of the world, know all too well the intrinsic beauty in this most necessary part of growth and development of living things, including the nation of Iraq.

    Do you think a moth will emerge from the desert cocoon? My money (and more importantly that of the US and UN) is on a fantastic butterfly. At any rate I expect the next few months (not years) will reveal the answers we seek.

    jorian319 - 07:09pm Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11374 of 11500)

    If I was a country, a country with the foot of a tryant on the throat of my people, divided by creeds and classes, a country of wealth where most people were poor... if I was such a country, I would hope and pray that the US would invade my ass.

    lchic - 07:36pm Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11375 of 11500)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    ... no comment on your perverted sense of humour ...

    lchic - 07:37pm Apr 20, 2003 EST (# 11376 of 11500)
    ~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

    R&D is important Fred.

    So too engineers --- were every country to double their number the world would move forward smoother and faster.

    More Messages Recent Messages (124 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense