New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(11040 previous messages)
almarst2003
- 06:44am Apr 4, 2003 EST (#
11041 of 11048)
A strategic blunder? - http://www.townhall.com/columnists/paulcraigroberts/pcr20030403.shtml
The American invasion has made a Muslim hero out of Saddam
Hussein, a secular dictator who has spent his political life
suppressing Islamic political parties. Even worse, the
invasion has achieved the "Palestinization" of the Muslim
world and has united Muslims against us.
Muslims see the invasion of Iraq not as liberation but as
conquest and re-colonization. Samir Ragab, the staid chairman
of the hitherto moderate Egyptian Gazette, editorialized on
March 27: "The U.S. and Israel are one and the same thing.
Their common objective is to enfeeble Arabs and tear their
nation to pieces."
"It is genocide to me," says Cairo Times reporter Summer
Said. Even Christian Arabs have turned against us: George
Elnaber, a 36-year-old owner of an Amman, Jordan, supermarket
says: "Bush is an occupier and terrorist. We hate Americans
more than we hate Saddam now."
Similar sentiments are being expressed millionsfold
throughout the Middle East and Muslim Asia. They reflect the
overnight radicalization of the Muslim world, which will
affect politics. On March 31, Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak
said: "When it is over, if it is over, this war will have
horrible consequences. Instead of having one bin Laden, we
will have 100 bin Ladens."
Secular Middle Eastern rulers, who have suppressed Islamic
political parties, are isolated from the populations that they
govern. Islamic political movements were making headway, most
notably in Pakistan and Turkey, prior to the U.S. invasion of
Iraq. The invasion has energized Islamic politicians. Leaders
of the Mutahida Majlas-e-Aamal (MMA), a ruling religious party
alliance in Northwest Pakistan, responded by demanding that
Pakistan's "coward leaders" be pushed aside so that Pakistan's
nuclear arms can be used "for the protection of the Muslim
world." Not even our NATO ally Turkey would permit us to move
troops across its territory.
Deluded, perhaps, by the pro-war propaganda gushing from
the U.S. news media and neoconservative magazines, Secretary
of State Colin Powell and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld
have foolishly further inflamed Muslim opinion by issuing
"warnings" to Syria and Iran. Such warnings are regarded as
threats. In an interview with the Beirut daily newspaper
A-Safir, Syrian President Bashar Assad responded to the
threats, "We will not wait until we become the next target."
Clearly, U.S. policymakers lack understanding of the
volatile region of the world in which they are exercising a
heavy hand. With amazing hubris, U.S. policymakers have
stirred up thousands of Islamic terrorists whose future
victims could dwarf in number the deaths of Sept. 11 and the
Iraq war combined.
The same policymakers have exacerbated distrust of the
United States throughout the world. The Russian government
publicly announced that it expects the Americans to plant
weapons of mass destruction in Iraq in order to justify the
excuse used to invade Iraq. The Russians said that they will
believe no such American claim without independent
international inspection. What kind of cooperation can a
country so distrusted expect?
The U.S. invasion of Iraq is a strategic blunder, the costs
of which will mount over the next half century. If there is to
be a silver lining to this military adventure, perhaps it will
be the realization among the American public that the
neoconservative agenda of conquest of the Muslim Middle East
is beyond our available strength, thus diverting America from
a disastrous course, which would consume our blood and
treasure.
lchic
- 06:50am Apr 4, 2003 EST (#
11042 of 11048) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Why not just look for truth and get back to fact
The facts are : ___________________________________
Well yes, we all know what the facts are wrt Saddam -
Murdering Sadistic Bully and Brute!
rshow55
- 07:06am Apr 4, 2003 EST (#
11043 of 11048)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Almarst , my respect for you is very great - you've
often done impressive work here - but you do have to
ask yourself what you want to accomplish that can actually be
done, or that should be done.
The message that you're unhappy is well conveyed. But a
degree of incoherence that can never work well is also
being conveyed.
If you support the idea that Saddam is a "hero" - or have
much respect for people who do - don't you see what a
weak and disreputable position that is?
One doesn't have to like GWB to think so.
(5 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|