New York Times on the Web Forums Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's
war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars"
defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make
the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an
application of science be successful? Is a militarized space
inevitable, necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a
new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every
(1033 previous messages)
- 03:38pm Apr 3, 2002 EST (#1034
McNamara and Blight continue:
" (Kaplan) searched, " for "a paradigm for understanding the
world in the early decades of the 21st century." He found none. He
did, however, reach this conclusion: "We are not in control."
". . . . Other human beings, people like ourselves, are already
burning in Dantean infernos. Whole nation-states are on the brink of
collapse. At a minimum, they deserve our sympathy and whatever
assistance we can give. But we must also consider the possibility
that their fate and ours may be linked to a greater extent than we
suppose. How much chaos, turmoil, and killing can occur before the
cool islands of tranquility in which we live begin to burn? The
Canadian journalist Michael Ignatieff has written that "most of us
persist in the belief that while the fires far away are terrible
things, we can keep them from our doors, and that while they may
consume the roofs of our neighbors, the sparks will never leap to
our own." We suggest that the figurative "sparks"órefugees, ethnic
killing, disease, chronic political instability, perhaps leading to
major war, even nuclear warówill begin to burn down (or at a
minimum, severely damage) our own abode long before 300 million
people are killed in war in this century.
Comment: This point, made before September 11, is reinforced now.
McNamara and Blight's first chapter ends:
" We propose to confront this danger by action based on a
Comment: Morality is essential. Some additional understanding may
be essential too.
- 03:40pm Apr 3, 2002 EST (#1035
Comment: From the wide perspective McNamara and Blight offer,
though the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a small proportion of the
agony of the last 100 years (about .13% of the deaths) is is not
small. The agony and ugliness is wrenching and beyond an individuals
full capacity to understand. At the same time, it seems to me, the
conflict contains elements of hope -- as well as much to fear.
Here are two things that give me hope:
1. Lying, deception, and dehumanization are all
easy, and much on view in the Middle East, but they are less easy
than they used to be.
2. People who, at important levels, want peace are
finding that, as they are, and as their situation is - they can't
do the things needed, in the real context, to effectively make
peace. They are finding this in public, and under pressure. It is
clear that good people using current understandings and procedures
are getting stumped. The perception is widening and deepening that
there is an unsatisfactory situation here that needs to be
understood , dealt with , and solved.
What might have to be added to the argument that war should be
obsolete, made 90 years ago, that would make that argument
effective? Perhaps not so much. We need to be better than we
are, when it counts, about facing facts. For technical reasons, and
perhaps moral reasons as well, it is getting easier for us to
"connect the same dots" so that, on issues that matter enough, we're
"reading off the same page" -- whether we like the facts or not. We
may also be getting closer to learning, really understanding, really
facing, basic facts about how easily and brutally and bravely people
fight - - how natural it is, under too-common circumstrances, for
people to fight to the death, and kill effectively and coldly. If we
understood this, we might master the basic etiology of war -- and
make wars both less likely and less costly.
With weapons of mass destruction too-widely available, we've got
good reasons to work to do this -- because we face risks that stunts
like "missile defense" can't address
3/1/02 6:07pm ... MD84 rshow55
- but that more insight might be able to.
- 04:07pm Apr 3, 2002 EST (#1036
lchic and Rshow55:
What is the justification for walking into a seder dinner and
blowing up innocent men, women and children?
New York Times on the Web Forums Science