New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10989 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:24am Apr 3, 2003 EST (# 10990 of 10994) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Here are more links from this thread commenting on the possibility that Saddam is dead.

"He's dead" as an explanation for strange conduct: 9900-1 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11442

A definition including a suggestion that this question should check a rush to war - and a way to check: 9902-3 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11446

Almarst denying Saddam's being living or dead matters - list of issues: 9905 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11449

If Saddam is dead - new possibilities open up: 9926 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11470

It seems to me that, if the United Nations decision making means anything - the matter needs to be checked: 9928 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11472

Test question: if Saddam is dead - would leaders know what to do? 9933 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11477

But if the decision to go to war is already made - nothing matters: 9937 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11482

If Saddam is probably dead - the old challenge "Saddam" gave to debate Bush should be accepted , because legitimacy determines how people fight. 9942-3 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11487

9945 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11490

9948-9 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11493

Is Iraq is a country run by "the Wizard of Oz" ? 9950 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11495

It is easy to check the matter, and the stakes are huge: 9951-52 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11496

9955-6 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11500

Almarst - Saddam's survival isn't everything: 9964 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11509

"The Saddam Hussein show" 9987 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.UpbZapbp64w.208935@.f28e622/11532

Iraqi leader controls prime time with cool, confidence http://www.msnbc.com/news/884593.asp?0sl=-23

Picture: Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein speaks to his war cabinet in Baghdad in this image from television. Saddam has lately assumed a prominent role on the Iraqi television news, imparting a cool diligence to the nation of 23 million people.

. . .

lchic - 10:35am Mar 15, 2003 EST (# 9988

Dead

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=dead

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?dict=P

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=dead

http://dictionary.cambridge.org/results.asp?searchword=dead

More Messages Recent Messages (4 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us