New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10938 previous messages)
jorian319
- 09:57pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10939 of 10946)
Check Swaziland radio, alarmst - I'm sure they can
fabricate something to your delight. OR keep reading the
Guardian - pretty much that same thing. Another 48 civilian
casualties here, another 197 children burned alive there...
all in the amount of time that, given blessed peace, Saddam
and his charming kids could have tortured a thousand or so for
their amusement - which seems to be of paramount importance to
SOME people here.
almarst2003
- 10:01pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10940 of 10946)
Jorian,
It must have being a torture for you all those years Saddam
is in power. If so, i can undestand your sense of relief.
almarst2003
- 10:03pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10941 of 10946)
The US and British governments have dragged us into a mess
that will last for years - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Columnists/Column/0,5673,926952,00.html
The "strategists" are waking up... unfortunatly always too
late.
lchic
- 10:32pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10942 of 10946) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
How many good people were lost to Iraq
over years past
and why
why did they have to
DIE
Those lost today are precious but few Had 'Saddam'
played to the rules
Those lost today are precious but few The ART of WAR
The RULES of WAR
Conventions
A new game?
A game that's NEW?
(4 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|