New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10926 previous messages)

lchic - 08:45pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (# 10927 of 10946)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

A nothern KURD commented recently that they'd been happy with the US assistance post 1991.

It had been a 'best' time for them when they could go about their business peacefully.

Is there any reason why the other two latitudianal sectors of Iraq couldn't do the same post 2003 ?

lchic - 09:00pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (# 10928 of 10946)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

E-mail .... Rummy's not been MD-ing them has he? Wonder if my messages were piggy-backed via baghdad ... lost or late!

almarst2003 - 09:04pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (# 10929 of 10946)

Forty-eight more civilians, including women and children, have been killed and 310 wounded in US-British bombings around this town south of Baghdad in the last 24 hours, a hospital director revealed.

The deaths brought to 73 the number of Iraqi civilians who have died under allied bombings since Monday.

Thirty-three civilians, including women and children, were killed and 310 wounded in a coalition bombing on the southern province of Babylon on Tuesday morning, a hospital director said.

Murtada Abbas said the bombing targeted the Nader residential area at the southern outskirts of the farming town of Hilla, 80 kilometres (50 miles) south of the capital.

He was speaking at the Hilla hospital where a large number of children lay wounded under blankets on the floor due to a shortage of beds.

At the scene of the bombing, dozens of what seemed to be parts of cluster bombs equipped with small parachutes were peppered over a large area, an AFP correspondent at the site said.

Iraqi soldiers were seen collecting the debris, which witnesses said coalition warplanes had dropped over the neighborhood. The soldiers poured fuel on the bombs before setting them on fire to explode the ordnance.

Dozens of homes were destroyed in the bombing that also killed donkeys and chickens, the correspondent said.

Fifteen members of a family were killed late Monday when their pickup truck was blown up by a rocket from a US Apache helicopter in the region of Haidariya near Hilla, the sole survivor of the attack told AFP on Tuesday.

Razek al-Kazem al-Khafaji said he lost his wife, six children, his father, his mother, his three brothers and their wives.

Khafaji, sitting among the 15 coffins at the local hospital, said the family was fleeing fierce fighting in Nasiriya, further south, when they were targetted by a US helicopter in Haidariya.

US troops admitted killing seven women and children when they opened fire Monday on a civilian vehicle at a military checkpoint manned by the US Army's Third Infantry Division at Najaf, 150 kilometers (95 miles) south of Baghdad.

On Monday, eighteen civilians were also killed in coalition bombings on Baghdad, according to Information Minister Mohammad Said al-Sahhaf.

http://sg.news.yahoo.com/030401/1/39o1f.html

A FULL-SCALE LIBERATION

BTW. Aren't cluster bombs a war crime?

fredmoore - 09:11pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (# 10930 of 10946)

Almarst ...

If you put your mind to it I think you could make the royal gala celebration sound like a global tragedy.

You are gifted comrade!

lchic - 09:14pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (# 10931 of 10946)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Headers

Plan? http://www.economist.com/

http://news.bbc.co.uk/

http://www.independent.co.uk/

http://www.guardian.co.uk/

  • Stranger than fiction -- Israel spending £27,000 a month on protection for lone settler http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=393128 (Tax payers USA foot the bill?)

    http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/

    almarst2003 - 09:15pm Apr 1, 2003 EST (# 10932 of 10946)

    Some gentelmen complain that Iraq wage a "dirty" war. Not according to the "rules".

    I can fully understand their indignation. Same thing happend when Napoleon and later Hitler invaded Russia. And I have learned about their indignations a long time ago.

    Its happens that Elephant, if not careful and treatenes the Sneak, dies from the Sneak's bite. The moral: Even Elephant must think before acting. That why God gave him brains, not just muscules.

    That's must be Karma.

    More Messages Recent Messages (14 following messages)

     Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
     Your Preferences

     [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





  • Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


    Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us