New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10875 previous messages)
almarst2003
- 12:13am Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10876 of 10886)
Why Colin Powell Should Go - http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/22/opinion/22KELL.html?ex=1049346000&en=1cc14996177233e1&ei=5070
By BILL KELLER
he famous hardheaded definition of war is "the continuation
of politics by other means." In the real world, though, war is
the failure of politics. This war — undertaken at such cost to
America's own interests — is specifically a failure of Colin
Powell's politics.
Even if you believe that this war is justified, the route
to it has been an ugly display of American opportunism and
bullying, dissembling and dissonance. The administration has
neglected other lethal crises around the world, alienated the
allies we need for almost everything else on our agenda and
abandoned friends working for the kind of values we profess to
be exporting
almarst2003
- 12:19am Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10877 of 10886)
DE-JA-VU ALL OVER AGAIN http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/30/opinion/30DOWD.html
We're shocked that the enemy forces don't observe the rules
of war. We're shocked that it's hard to tell civilians from
combatants, and friends from foes. Adversaries use guerrilla
tactics; they are irregulars; they take advantage of the
hostile local weather and terrain; they refuse to stay in
uniform. Golly, as our secretary of war likes to say, it's
unfair.
Some of their soldiers are mere children. We know we have
overwhelming, superior power, yet we can't use it all.
We're stunned to discover that the local population treats
our well-armed high-tech troops like invaders.
almarst2003
- 12:35am Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10878 of 10886)
lchik,
I am missing to see your indignation about what is going on
in Iraq.
Remember Grozny?
almarst2003
- 12:43am Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10879 of 10886)
The United States is investigating an incident in which its
soldiers shot dead at least seven Iraqi civilians whose car
failed to stop at a checkpoint. A senior US military officer
has defended the shooting as "absolutely... the right
thing" http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/2904911.stm
THERE WILL BE DONE MANY MANY MANY MORE "RIGHT THINGS".
FOR SCEPTICS, WAIT UNTILL WE DO A WRONG ONE! YOU WILL SEE THE
DIFFERENCE!
almarst2003
- 08:05am Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10880 of 10886)
Let's see, what did we learn so far:
The Law of unintended consequences still works.
The "good" intentions indeed can lead to Hell.
A lot of people can be safely dupped for a short time
(relative to the age of Uniwerse)
If theory contradics the facts - too bad for the
facts.
... to be continued.
lchic
- 08:10am Apr 1, 2003 EST (#
10881 of 10886) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Almarst - 'Taking time out over next few weeks ... 'the
tyranny of distance' that is Australia eases for a while :)
___________________
(5 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|