New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10857 previous messages)
almarst2003
- 10:41pm Mar 31, 2003 EST (#
10858 of 10879)
Row over secret plan for post-war Iraq - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,927055,00.html
A disagreement has broken out within the Bush
administration over a new government that the US is secretly
planning in Kuwait to rule Iraq.
Under the plan, the government will consist of 23
ministries, each headed by an American. Every ministry
will also have four Iraqi advisers appointed by the Americans,
the Guardian has learned.
The government will take over Iraq city by city. Areas
declared "liberated" by General Tommy Franks will be
transferred to the temporary government under the overall
control of Jay Garner, the for mer US general appointed to
head a military occupation of Iraq.
In anticipation of the Baghdad regime's fall, members of
this interim government have begun arriving in Kuwait.
Decisions on the government's composition appear to be
entirely in US hands, particularly those of Paul Wolfowitz,
the deputy secretary of defence. This has annoyed Gen
Garner, who is officially in charge but who, according to
sources close to the planning of the government, has had to
accept the inclusion of a number of controversial Iraqis in
advisory roles.
The most controversial of Mr Wolfowitz's proposed
appointees is Ahmed Chalabi, the head of the opposition Iraqi
National Congress, together with his close associates,
including his nephew.
During his years in exile, Mr Chalabi has cultivated links
with Congress to raise funds, and has become the Pentagon's
darling among the Iraqi opposition. The defence secretary,
Donald Rumsfeld, is one of his strongest supporters.
The state department and CIA, on the other hand, regard him
with deep suspicion.
Mr Chalabi had envisaged becoming prime minister in an
interim government, and is disappointed that no such post is
included in the US plan. Instead, the former banker will be
offered an advisory job at the finance ministry.
A senior INC official said last night that Mr Chalabi would
not countenance a purely advisory position. The official
added: "It is certainly not the INC's intention to advise any
US ministers in Iraq. Our position is that no Americans should
run Iraqi ministries. The US is talking about an interim Iraqi
authority taking over, but we are calling for a provisional
government."
The revelation about direct rule is likely to cause
intense political discomfort for Tony Blair, who has been
pressing for UN and international involvement in Iraq's
reconstruction to overcome opposition in Britain as well as
heal divisions across Europe.
The Foreign Office said last night that a "relatively
fluid" number of British officials had been seconded to the
planning team.
Last week Colin Powell, the US secretary of state, told
Congress that immediately after the fall of President Saddam's
regime, the US military would take control of the Iraqi
government.
His only concession was that this would be done with the
"full understanding" of the international community and with
"the UN presence in the form of a UN special coordinator".
By imposing Mr Chalabi and his clique on the official
administration-in-waiting, Mr Wolfowitz seems to be trying to
appease the INC leader, even at the risk of annoying Gen
Garner and those in Washington who consider him unsuitable for
a senior post.
Mr Chalabi is former chairman of the Petra Bank in
Jordan which collapsed, bringing ruin to many of its
depositors. He was eventually convicted of fraud in his
absence by a Jordanian court, though he maintains he is
innocent.
Mr Chalabi has not lived in Iraq since 1956, apart from
a short period organising resistance in the Kurdish north in
the 1990s, and is thought to have little support inside
Iraq.
EXPERIENCE DOES MATTER. THE PENTAGON SHOULD LISTEN TO
BRITS HOW TO SET UP A COLONIAL RULE! NO IF OR BUTS!
almarst2003
- 10:42pm Mar 31, 2003 EST (#
10859 of 10879)
British military critical of US troops' heavy-handed
style with civilians. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,926957,00.html
WHAT'S WRONG? NO FLOWERS - NO SMILES!
almarst2003
- 10:49pm Mar 31, 2003 EST (#
10860 of 10879)
It will end in disaster - http://www.guardian.co.uk/comment/story/0,3604,926820,00.html
The US and British governments have dragged us into a
mess that will last for years - George Monbiot, Tuesday April
1, 2003
OH NO... ANOTHER PESSIMIST?
almarst2003
- 10:55pm Mar 31, 2003 EST (#
10861 of 10879)
The future of the International Space Station is in doubt
due to an American refusal to fund Russia's contribution
because of Moscow's continuing assistance to the nuclear
programme of Iran, labelled by the US as an "axis of evil"
state. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,3604,927089,00.html
(18 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|