New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10828 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:34am Mar 31, 2003 EST (# 10829 of 10832) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

We shouldn't forget about beauty, joy, and hope.

I loved lchic's cite of the "The Happy Wanderer" http://www.djmorton.demon.co.uk/scouting/songs/wanderer.htm

I feel that we could use a pause, from time to time, to give thought to beauty and joy -- things worth working for --- worth the effort it takes, for instance, to prevent the stupid destruction of the world.

Here's a song I like - C:\MissileDefense\MissileDefense\a_md2000s\md2575.htm that a NYT reviewer liked, too:

" I believe, for instance, that the 20th century's most intoxicating waltz is ''Let's Go Fly a Kite'' from ''Mary Poppins.'' from Best Love Song; Two Girls and a Guy by Lorrie Moore

- Let's Go Fly A Kite

Let's go fly a kite

Up to the highest height!

Let's go fly a kite and send it soaring

Up through the atmosphere

Up where the air is clear

Oh, let's go fly a kite!

http://www.stlyrics.com/lyrics/marypoppins/letsgoflyakite.htm

Perspectives matter - and different people can feel differently. And there are many ways of looking at things. Edward Tufte cited many of them in a great paragraph

http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8211.htm http://www.mrshowalter.net/a_md8000s/md8214_8218.htm

But is some things "depend on how you look at it" - some things are clear from a lot of perspectives. Any way I feel comfortable looking at it, I have a lot of respect for Tony Blair.

I think this is a hopeful time. What are we fighting about? If we were clearer, we could fight a great deal less.

More Messages Recent Messages (3 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us