New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10702 previous messages)

rshow55 - 11:56am Mar 29, 2003 EST (# 10703 of 10712) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Both good points.

rshow55 - 12:01pm Mar 29, 2003 EST (# 10704 of 10712) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

The following questions are worth some thought.

What would the Iraqi people want? (And what could they really settle for, as they are? )

What would the American people want? (And what could they really settle for, as they are? )

What would the "Arab street" want? (And what could they really settle for, as they are? )

How about analogous questions for all the other players, as national groups, as military players, as leaders, as members of organizations?

Is it really true that we're at an impasse - or necessarily headed into a meat grinder?

Ought not to be. And nobody ought to ask anybody else to change unchangeable things.

almarst2003 - 12:03pm Mar 29, 2003 EST (# 10705 of 10712)

UK forces 'destroy' Saddam statues - http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/2898003.stm

British forces say they have staged a raid into the southern city of Basra to destroy a large statue of Saddam Hussein.

WE DIDN'T REACH THE TOP OF AN ABSURD YET, DID WE?

rshow55 - 12:16pm Mar 29, 2003 EST (# 10706 of 10712) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

We'll get closer, the way things are going.

The Brits must be getting desperate.

On my questions in 10704 - another basic question is

What would people be proud to do - at the time - and proud to explain later.

An often-neglected question.

More Messages Recent Messages (6 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us