New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10599 previous messages)
almarst2003
- 12:58am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10600 of 10614)
"the people of Iraq need to shake off Saddam"
I would live it to people of Iraq.
Not to Pearl-Wolfowitch-Cheiney-Ramsfeld-Bush family.
This is just outrageous. Who gave anyone outside of Iraq
the right to do what is done now?
What if the cold war would tun out differently and USSR
would decide to give the Australian, British and American
proletariat a chance for a better life, guaranteed
employement, free child care, education and medicine? By
military force, in case you are not smart enough to overthrow
your regimes.
Please, don't disappear into nirvanna.
fredmoore
- 01:06am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10601 of 10614)
Almarst ....
The Cold War is over ... you can come in now!
LOL
bbbuck
- 01:15am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10602 of 10614)
Alarmist2002 is trying to take over this forum.
Someone should report him to the immigration authorities.
Who's got his address?
almarst2003
- 01:42am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10603 of 10614)
Richard Perle, a chief architect of the war on Iraq,
resigned yesterday as chairman of the influential defence
policy board following allegations that he faced a serious
conflict of interest over his corporate connections. The US
defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld yesterday accepted his
resignation but asked him to remain on the board. - http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,924557,00.html
"conflict of interest"? Quite the opposite. All
interests are perfectly aligned.
almarst2003
- 01:47am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10604 of 10614)
Noam Chomsky
"American power is so great that no outside force can
call us to account; hence the overwhelming urgency of the
effort to overcome the effects of a generation of
indoctrination and a long history of self-adulation. We will
simply compound the tragedy of Vietnam if we do not exploit
this opportunity to break loose from the stranglehold of
ideology and the tradition of conformism that makes a mockery
of the values we pretend to hold. The first step towards
political sanity must be intensive self-examination, exposure
not only of what we do and what we represent in the world
today, but also of the attitudes that color and distort our
perception of our international behavior."
Source: American Power and the New Mandarins(1969), p.
244-245
almarst2003
- 01:48am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10605 of 10614)
"Who's got his address?"
I do. Give me yours and will mail it to you. Personally:)
almarst2003
- 01:49am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10606 of 10614)
"The Cold War is over"
Indeed. The heat is rising.
almarst2003
- 01:56am Mar 28, 2003 EST (#
10607 of 10614)
The United Nations will refuse to play a "subservient" role
or act as a "subcontractor" to the United States in the
reconstruction of Iraq, the organisation's development chief
has warned. http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story/0,2763,924493,00.html
Cheiney: "We are talking MONEY now! Its time to bomb
their headquaters"
(7 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|