New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10530 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:40am Mar 26, 2003 EST (# 10531 of 10534) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

4529 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.05dna30h59t.1579267@.f28e622/5722 relates my story to Nash, and includes a message I've often repeated, that I hope people find of interest:

I set out some of the story in reference to the movie Casablanca , in PSYCHWAR, CASABLANCA, AND TERROR http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/0

Especially the core story part, from posting 13 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/12 to posting 23 http://talk.guardian.co.uk/WebX?14@@.ee7a163/22 There is a comment in #26 that I feel some may find interesting, as well...

An illustrated script of Casablanca http://www.edict.com.hk/movies/casablanca/casablanca1.htm

One can see more details in the links connected to Bill Casey if you click : rshow55

mazza9 - 09:56am Mar 26, 2003 EST (# 10532 of 10534)
"Quae cum ita sunt" Caesar's Gallic Commentaries

Jorian et al.

I've blanked our Rshow, lchic and alarmst but your posts leave no doubt in my mind that the same drivel that has polluted this site for over 10,000 posts continues.

We didn't use guerilla tactics against the British so that a dictator could make everyone's life miserable. Yes, we're not perfect but we try to be fair and our accomplishments have made the world a better place.

Buck Showalter of the Texas Rangers knows so much more than Robert Showalter of the NYTimes missile defense forum. Buck knows that you can't send your runner on second to tackle the short stop to prevent a play to first! There are rules and umpires to enforce those rules. Our whole life is governed by the "Rule of Law"! Yes the umpires sometmes make mistakes and we've seen the instant replay of the play at home where the ball has been dropped, the runner is safe and the umpire is calling the runner out!! Once again we accept these mistakes because we BELIEVE in the rule of law.

No shredders, no torture, no rape rooms, no beheading children in front of their parents. Have you been to a city council meeting or a school board meeting. Where the rubber meets the road, we acknowledge and adhere to Roberts Rules of Order!

I move that we destroy Saddam and all evil dictators who rule by the sword!

jorian319 - 10:29am Mar 26, 2003 EST (# 10533 of 10534)

I move that we destroy Saddam and all evil dictators who rule by the sword!

Would that we could do so covertly, to avoid the corruption of credit-takers and the reprisals of those who stand to benefit from the continuance of brutality.

Some things never change, though. Apparently the running Rshow sermon of this forum is one of them. I rarely read those posts, because he (I think of Ichic as his alter-ego, and suspect they are the same person) rarely responds directly to anyone else, and he regularly relies on such dubious sources as The Guardian. It looks like a loop-tape for all its repetition.

Alarmst is another story - I scan his/her posts occasionally just to reconfirm lock-step conformance to the popular impression being marketed by the global left. Always hoping to see an evolving attitude, usually disappointed.

More Messages Recent Messages (1 following message)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us