New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10478 previous messages)

lchic - 01:51pm Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10479 of 10508)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Headlines

http://www.guardian.co.uk/

http://www.abc.net.au/news/world/ http://www.abc.net.au/news/world/middleeast/default.htm UK BLAIR http://www.abc.net.au/news/newsitems/s816248.htm

Independent http://www.independent.co.uk/

Basra Saddam fires Mortars on his own people http://news.independent.co.uk/world/middle_east/story.jsp?story=390567

FISK - Robert Fisk: Saddam starts to sound more like his hero, Uncle Joe http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/story.jsp?story=390536

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/default.stm http://news.bbc.co.uk/

Earlier this month, USAID invited five US engineering giants to submit bids for Iraq reconstruction work expected to be worth up to $900m.

The companies were Bechtel, Louis Berger, Fluor, Kellogg Brown & Root and The Parsons Corporation.

USAID plans call for operating ports and airports and repairing utility networks, roads, bridges, schools and hospitals.

UK construction firms have complained privately about not being invited to bid. But it is thought possible that some will pick up sub-contracting work from US lead contractors.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/business/2884701.stm

lchic - 01:57pm Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10480 of 10508)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

C O N F L I C T of I N T E R E S T

Conflict of Interest is a looming issue.

Seems those close to Bush are both Politicians and Business guys ...

Being handy to the Politico

Puts them in the know

Watch those contracts flow

There are demands that PostWarIraq be administered by the UN -- which in turn -- works in with 'the Iraqi people' matching contracts to their needs through many business providers world wide.

lchic - 02:10pm Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10481 of 10508)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

A retired mil-expert likened the view, the take, the understanding, the seeing

of individuals

on the war front

as them

seeing their world

their view point

as if looking through

a straw http://www.abc.net.au/7.30/

_______

If there are thousands of reporting-backs from Iraq, then, imagine each within a tube of knowing

The military commanders in war cabinet have to both appreciate every 'individual' take

and see the cumulative picture

The only tubes so far connected with Iraq have been Aluminium *!* not perspex

____________________________________________

lchic - 02:16pm Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10482 of 10508)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Oscars - Michael MOORE

... his remarks about George Bush, whom he called the "fictitious" president, and his opposition to the war in Iraq, caused ... furore

http://film.guardian.co.uk/oscars/story/0,12712,921550,00.html

More Messages Recent Messages (26 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us