New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10472 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:28am Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10473 of 10508) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

A reason things can be sorted out is that, on things that matter most, patterns very often repeat again and again.

Fractals circumstances and SELF-SIMILARITY: http://math.bu.edu/DYSYS/chaos-game/node5.html

10330-10332 http://forums.nytimes.com/webin/WebX?8@28.74hFaQTc5d0.1542655@.f28e622/11876

There's plenty to hope for, if we work at it - and if people get concerned enough to think straight - we can sort out a lot.

Lchic and I have some of that sorting done, if people could arrange to debrief us on a little more systematic basis than is happening here - it might save a lot of blood an money. Though I understand why that is an "impossible" request.

almarst2003 - 09:29am Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10474 of 10508)

Hope does not help the dead.

I am not Russian.

I do not live in Russia.

I don't talk to Putin.

almarst2003 - 10:35am Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10475 of 10508)

Looking for the facts? http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydisplay.cfm?storyID=3251554&thesection=news&thesubsection=world

A range of weapons in the American arsenal - such as landmines and cluster bombs - are banned by Australia, and Canberra has emphasised that its forces will refuse to attack civilian targets, including key bridges, dams and other vital infrastructure of the kind bombed by the US in the 1991 Gulf War.

Will ICC welcome the whole "family"?

almarst2003 - 10:41am Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10476 of 10508)

Petition from Veterans Rejected at White House - http://www.vaiw.org/vet/index.php

No wonder, they are not in a "family".

lchic - 01:32pm Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10477 of 10508)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

al-Jazeera

Based in the tiny Arabian Gulf state of Qatar – this satellite channel has become a broadcasting and political phenomenon, both reporting and influencing Middle East conflicts with a freedom of speech that’s unprecedented in the region.

Evan Williams reports from behind the sets and make-up rooms at Al Jazeera, and finds that while Al Jazeera’s popularity is immense, the network has also attracted some powerful enemies.

A series of exclusive reports on Osama bin Laden and his Al Qaeda network has angered the United States Government, which accused Al Jazeera of giving far too much air time to the fundamentalist cause. But the broadsides can be more than verbal. At the height of the Afghanistan conflict in 2001, Al Jazeera’s Kabul bureau took a direct hit from U.S bombs. The Pentagon claimed it was a mistake.

According to Al Jazeera presenter Faisal al-Qaseem, accusations of bias fly thick and fast. Evidence he says – that his journalists are doing their job.

“I myself have been accused of being all sorts of things ................

http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/stories/s811500.htm http://www.abc.net.au/foreign/

lchic - 01:37pm Mar 25, 2003 EST (# 10478 of 10508)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

The above showed a presenter (who had spent time in the UK) and who looked at and got Arabs to talk about issues that had been taboo - including women discussing their lot in the multi-marriage stakes.

This presenter draws huge viewing audiences and the discussion of his topics flows out widely through the Arab-world-community.

He's getting guests to examine and question aspects of Islamic Culture.

Opening minds --- so they can move on to reshape culture to modern environs.

More Messages Recent Messages (30 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us