New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10423 previous messages)
rshow55
- 11:07am Mar 24, 2003 EST (#
10424 of 10428)
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click
"rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for
on this thread.
Last time I looked, the stock markets were way down - over
3 % in not much more than an hour.
That's stupid. What did people reasonably expect?
It looks to me like things are going pretty well - but on
the other hand, I expected that in a military situation
such as this, some thousands of American soldiers were
likely to be wounded, and very many were likely to die.
Sometimes the coverage in the NYT is so distinguished that
it revives my sometimes-wavering confidence in Bill Casey's
judgement and advice on a key issue. The coverage of the war,
so far, has been very impressive - and, if biased - not more
biased than must be expected under current journalistic
conditions.
I think the following coverage on market instability is
also really distinguished, and that people need to
remember how important it is that people judge well.
We need more stability - fewer "wild rides" such as
described in July 2002
Week in Review: Hold On for a Wild Ride http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/21/weekinreview/21BERE.html
Think about how big a 2.5% change in valuation is.
INTERACTIVE GRAPHIC The Incredible Shrinking Stock
Market More Than $7 Trillion Gone By SETH W. FEASTER http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/21/weekinreview/20020721_MARKET_GRAPHIC.html
"What follows are various ways of looking at
the market's continuing contraction. Here's a beautiful
technique -- graphs under graphs:
Click on the graph in Feaster's graphic, and there are more
wonderful, enlightening graphs:
Market Value: 17.25 Trillion - March 24, 2000 http://www.nytimes.com/packages/html/weekinreview/20020721_MARKET/nwr_MARKET_01.html
. Market Value: 10.03 Trillion - July 18,
2002
. Market Structure:
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
FRANK RICH is right in The Road to Perdition http://www.nytimes.com/2002/07/20/opinion/20FRIC.html
. . . "Everything is connected."
When Bill Casey advised me that, after easier options were
exhausted, my best chance was to "come in through The New York
Times - - he had good reasons. When exposition is difficult,
and depth is needed - it is the best newspaper in the world.
Surely the best in the U.S. Though not, perhaps, as good as
Casey thought in every respect.
The Times can't and won't break a story that is too
difficult all alone -- and for pretty good reasons. But some
situations are unstable - maybe even ready to "break" -- and
break into print.
- - -
The idea that, when a few tens of Americans get killed in a
war we started, the market valuation of stocks dives
300 billion dollars worth is stupid. People need more
stability than that - in the US , and all over the world. We
need to lie less - when it matters. For all sorts of reasons
of life and death - and dollars and sense.
- - -
For what little it may be worth - I think things are going
well, and that a good deal of disciplined optimism is
called for. Mixed with some seriousness - there are problems
before us that we can solve.
almarst2003
- 11:57am Mar 24, 2003 EST (#
10425 of 10428)
FBI, Justice Dept. Increase Use of Wiretaps, Records
Searches - http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A16287-2003Mar23.html
Expectations...
The war against terror and simultanious establishement of
American Century by military force will take more and cost
more then some have expected. As I see it - the gradually
steeper perpetual down sloop. "The Road to Perdition"
If the truth is a first casualty of WAR, we may not see it
again for a very long time.
BTW. I think the "liberties" will just follow.
(3 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|