New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10364 previous messages)

almarst2003 - 12:07pm Mar 23, 2003 EST (# 10365 of 10412)

By my observation we are vitnessing the Neo-Mongolian conquest. They too had a superior military. And not lesser ruthlessness.

dccougar - 12:16pm Mar 23, 2003 EST (# 10366 of 10412)
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion but not his own facts.

lchic - 11:11am Mar 23, 2003 EST [quoting] - "The gene… leaps from body to body down the generations, manipulating body after body in its own way and for its own ends..."

lchic, this Selfish Gene hypothesis sounds like Dawkins is attributing some sort of consciousness or intelligence or self-determination to these little molecular assemblages we call genes. I haven't read the past 10,000 postings in this forum, but what is your position on Dawkins' view... or on this method of expressing it?

lchic - 12:21pm Mar 23, 2003 EST (# 10367 of 10412)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

Gingus Khan along with Mongolian horsemen - a then superior mode of transportation were a ruthless bunch.

They terrorised Eurasia.

They plundered and took

BUT

They didn't 'build'

If eventually there was nothing to plunder, or, others had the new horse technology and could resist ... then those days of Mongolian Empire were over.

_____________________________

Oil is the black-blood of the C19,C20, C21 horse - motor transportation

These blood banks of the Middle East have been slow to move from pipeline economy to modernity ... the transition is happening - slowly.

Just as the plunder strategy of Gingus Khan became outmoded, so too, the failure to Nation-build a humanitarian secular economy that meets the needs of all within national boundaries.

Where people can work and give of their best under he leadership of modernday gods - psychologists - and self-actualise to maximium potential.

Maslow type link ...

http://www.performance-unlimited.com/samain.htm

fredmoore - 12:28pm Mar 23, 2003 EST (# 10368 of 10412)

Robert,

" Shamanism is one of the more interesting religions in Mongolia. "

It appears it may be a CIA religion as well. I saw on SKY News yesterday an interview with a former CIA 'op' in which he said that they believed Saddam was into 'channeling' and that they suspected he may have connections with the ancient Babylonian king, Nebuchanezer. He mentioned that they were reading up on their ancient history to see if their were any clues as to Saddams behaviour. He said that Saddam was a brilliant strategist and worth standing back to look at.

With your knowledge of the CIA, what is your take on this?

Out.

rshow55 - 12:38pm Mar 23, 2003 EST (# 10369 of 10412) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

I've heard it said that certain bureaucrats have suffered from "an extreme juxtaposition of their bodily parts" . . . and in addition to muddle, stupidity and deception - there are some very mixed motives, too.

More Messages Recent Messages (43 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us