New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a
nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a
"Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed
considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense
initiatives more successful? Can such an application of
science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable,
necessary or impossible?
Read Debates, a new
Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published
every Thursday.
(10358 previous messages)
lchic
- 11:11am Mar 23, 2003 EST (#
10359 of 10412) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
"" According to the Christian religion, human beings and
all other created things exist for the greater glory of God;
according to sociobiology, human beings and all other living
things exist for the benefit of their genes.
The expression ‘their genes' is probably not perfectly
orthodox, from the strict sociobiological point of view; being
rather too apt to suggest that genes are part of our
equipment, whereas (according to sociobiology) we are part of
theirs. .........
Gods, in addition to being thought of as more intelligent
and powerful than we are, are always thought of as being
immortal. It was therefore to be expected that sociobiologists
would wish to ascribe this attribute too, to genes. Here is a
passage from Richard Dawkins on this subject. The ‘gene…does
not grow senile; it is no more likely to die when it is a
million years old than when it is only a hundred. It leaps
from body to body down the generations, manipulating body
after body in its own way and for its own ends, abandoning a
succession of mortal bodies before they sink in senility and
death. The genes are the immortals…' ........
......... every religion (or at any rate every one I know
of) is incomprehensible when it is not obviously false.
http://www.royalinstitutephilosophy.org/articles/stove_new_religion.htm
book - The Extended Phenotype / Richard Dawkins
So Dawkins assumes 'true' religion ... uhmm ... which ? And
why do folks like to hide and work under a banner of religion
?
almarst2003
- 11:18am Mar 23, 2003 EST (#
10360 of 10412)
There is huge difference between RELIGION and
banner of religion
Just like between any IDEOLOGY and REALITY under
the bunner of ideology.
Not that this ever was an obsticle for criminals to exploit
both to the max.
lchic
- 11:26am Mar 23, 2003 EST (#
10361 of 10412) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
John Paul said "Violence and arms can never resolve the
problems of men."
____________
Raises the question
'What did JP do over the past 30 years to moderate tyrants
?'
_____________
The Incas had an interesting civilisation - collected taxes
to use to give 'COMMON PROVISION' for the aged, sick and poor
- and looked from high in the Andean Ranges to the 'heavens'.
The learned people observed goups of stars - contrasting
their history with star movements an attitude of fatalism
developed (wrongly) - so much so that they did not resist the
C15 Spanish invasion that trashed their culture.
http://www.barbaraperrins.com/milky.htm
http://www.google.com.au/search?q=Incas+milky+way+fox+llama&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&hl=en&btnG=Google+Search&meta=
lchic
- 11:32am Mar 23, 2003 EST (#
10362 of 10412) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
Interesting how the past (above) is seen as
CULTURAL IMMERSION TRAVEL
AN AUTHENTIC CULTURAL IMMERSION Whereas a
present-cultural-immersion might be 'war' or 'tourism' ... or
a visit to the cinema perhaps.
lchic
- 11:44am Mar 23, 2003 EST (#
10363 of 10412) ~~~~ It got understood and exposed
~~~~
"" Shamanism is one of the more interesting religions in
Mongolia.
Mongolians consider the sky "the father" and earth "mother
nature".
The sharman acts as an intermediatery between the man and
the spirits.
http://www.geocities.com/gobinogloo/mongolianinfo.html#reli
Comment : It's interesting to note that most often with
religions there's the need for an intermediary,
interpretation, guides, special buildings, furbishings and
always 'collection plate'.
almarst2003
- 12:04pm Mar 23, 2003 EST (#
10364 of 10412)
Small tyrans can be moderated just by treat of force and
diplomacy. After all, they are not about taking over other
nations or the World.
Its a BIG TYRANS that can't be moderated untill destroyed.
(48 following messages)
New York Times on the Web Forums
Science
Missile Defense
|