New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10234 previous messages)

rshow55 - 09:56pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (# 10235 of 10248) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

By historical standards, that's a stunningly low body count - and a stunningly low incidence of wounding - given the situation as it has been, and the things that have been said. There have been plenty of crazy and angry people on all sides - yelling, screaming, and lying at the top of their lungs. Tactics as crazy as suicide bombing. Plenty of wrenching ugliness. It has been as ugly as it has been. But a century ago, one of the populatiobns involved would have exterminated the other, as likely as not. That hasn't happened.

Fights that would have been explosively unstable in past eras are a lot more damped today. That doesn't mean problems are solved. But they are more soluble than they've been before.

People and political institutions may not grow up, exactly. But if we keep at it, find ways to face up to what a workable international law has to do, and are lucky, incidence of death and agony from war may decline as the incidence of death from small pox has.

I'm worried, and sorry for the deaths that are to come. But hopeful that things can get better, too.

almarst2003 - 10:57pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (# 10236 of 10248)

Sen. Robert Byrd: 'Today I Weep for My Country' http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A56635-2003Mar19.html

"Today I weep for my country," said West Virginia Democratic Sen. Robert Byrd. "No more is the image of America one of strong, yet benevolent peacekeeper. ... Around the globe, our friends mistrust us, our word is disputed, our intentions are questioned.

"We flaunt our superpower status with arrogance," Byrd said, adding: "After war has ended the United States will have to rebuild much more than the country of Iraq. We will have to rebuild America's image around the globe."

When I came here I hoped it would be my country too.

Today I weep for my mistake. For crushed hope. For the dark future of my grandchild.

rshow55 - 11:28pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (# 10237 of 10248) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

Why do you think your grandchild has a dark future?

rshow55 - 11:28pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (# 10238 of 10248) Delete Message
Can we do a better job of finding truth? YES. Click "rshow55" for some things Lchic and I have done and worked for on this thread.

The War After War With Iraq By TIMOTHY GARTON ASH http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/20/opinion/20GART.html

Over the last few weeks, the geopolitical West of the cold war has collapsed before our eyes. No one can know what the shape of the new world will be. . . . I'll call them the Rumsfeldian, the Chiraco-Putinesque and the Blairite.

The Rumsfeldian idea — if idea is not too dignified a word — is that American might is right. . . . .

The Chiraco-Putinesque idea — if idea is not too dignified a word — is that American might is dangerous. . . .

That leaves Blairism. Tony Blair's idea is that we should recreate a larger version of the cold war West, in response to the new threats we face. . . . . .

lchic - 01:07am Mar 20, 2003 EST (# 10239 of 10248)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

She was imprisoned at fourteen

Raped

Raped

Raped

Some years later

still in prison

Raped

Raped

Raped

and mother of five

She is 'worried over' by a grandparent

Her mother

And she worries too for

Her children

Living in a prison

Of Rape and Torture

dR3

More Messages Recent Messages (9 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us