New York Times Readers Opinions
The New York Times

Home
Job Market
Real Estate
Automobiles
News
International
National
Washington
Business
Technology
Science
Health
Sports
New York Region
Education
Weather
Obituaries
NYT Front Page
Corrections
Opinion
Editorials/Op-Ed
Readers' Opinions


Features
Arts
Books
Movies
Travel
Dining & Wine
Home & Garden
Fashion & Style
Crossword/Games
Cartoons
Magazine
Week in Review
Multimedia
College
Learning Network
Services
Archive
Classifieds
Book a Trip
Personals
Theater Tickets
Premium Products
NYT Store
NYT Mobile
E-Cards & More
About NYTDigital
Jobs at NYTDigital
Online Media Kit
Our Advertisers
Member_Center
Your Profile
E-Mail Preferences
News Tracker
Premium Account
Site Help
Privacy Policy
Newspaper
Home Delivery
Customer Service
Electronic Edition
Media Kit
Community Affairs
Text Version
TipsGo to Advanced Search
Search Options divide
go to Member Center Log Out
  

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  /

    Missile Defense

Technology has always found its greatest consumer in a nation's war and defense efforts. Since the last attempts at a "Star Wars" defense system, has technology changed considerably enough to make the latest Missile Defense initiatives more successful? Can such an application of science be successful? Is a militarized space inevitable, necessary or impossible?

Read Debates, a new Web-only feature culled from Readers' Opinions, published every Thursday.


Earliest Messages Previous Messages Recent Messages Outline (10230 previous messages)

lchic - 08:18pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (# 10231 of 10235)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

"" The water, sanitation, and electricity infrastructures in Iraq have not recovered from the previous war. http://www.phrusa.org/research/iraq/021403.html

Here's a point to appeal to the average Iraqi - have concerns for the means to the maslow basics - seems Saddam has no concerns re the real needs of the average man woman child in the street.

On the OIL issue -- there may be 'a lot' of oil in Iraq ... and Turkey's after a finger in the pie ... someone stop them coming in from the North and killing those Kurds ..

It's said that at the current rate of flow the OIL from Iraq will be insufficient ($) to carry out infrastructure re-building post 'war'.

One notes that these guys hadn't recovered from 91 in terms of infrastructure - water piped to people.

Lets hope that the Pentagon have factored in the need not to create disturbances that will fracture water mains .... additional to taking care not to harm those 4000 sites relating back to the cradle of civilisation - mesopotamia

http://www.google.com.au/search?hl=en&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=mesopotamia+Iraq&btnG=Google+Search&meta=

lchic - 08:39pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (# 10232 of 10235)
~~~~ It got understood and exposed ~~~~

A question to ask re oil .... how long before a different system of energy kicks in ... when it does then dirty old oil won't be worth a dime.

That's why the Middle East as a block needs a modern economy - where women get to shine!

almarst2003 - 09:40pm Mar 19, 2003 EST (# 10233 of 10235)

"The water, sanitation, and electricity infrastructures in Iraq have not recovered from the previous war."

ACT-I

Those where deliberetly destroyed by US. No appology here, please.

6000 Iraqis in trenches where burried into the ground by US tank-buldozers. No appology here, please.

ACT-II

To be filled up soon.

More Messages Recent Messages (2 following messages)

 Read Subscriptions  Subscribe  Search  Post Message
 Your Preferences

 [F] New York Times on the Web Forums  / Science  / Missile Defense





Home | Back to Readers' Opinions Back to Top


Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company | Privacy Policy | Contact Us